PracticeAuditTime to repair audit’s image

Time to repair audit's image

Auditing is in the spotlight as never before thanks to Enron. Every corporate failure and accounting correction is leapt upon as an 'audit failure' and 10 or 15 year old cases are recalled as if nothing had happened in the intervening years.

It is vital to repair any damage to public confidence in auditing and to prevent ill-judged knee-jerk reactions which could be damaging to both our profession and the capital markets. We should start by using the interest which has been generated to enhance public understanding of what we do and how we do it.

Much of the media comment at the moment is either ill-informed or superficial. Where has reference been made to the requirement in the UK to comply with auditing standards or else face disciplinary or regulatory action? How many ‘informed’ commentators have heard of SAS 240 (Quality Control for Audit Work) never mind read it.

Its pages should provide much reassurance.

In all the column inches about independence where is mention of the requirement since last year for an independent review partner, who does not meet the client, to concur with the key audit decisions on listed company audits? And if better audits are the aim shouldn’t we reasonably ask what is being done to strengthen the hand of the auditor? How, for example, do audit re-proposals help better quality auditing if they beat down the price and the scope?

We must find ways to publicise audit successes without breaching client confidentiality.

I lost count long ago of how many financial statements I’ve got amended or control systems improved over the years. We all have our war stories – let’s start telling them.

Audit committees play an important role. In my experience they have done an excellent job over the past few years in strengthening corporate governance and enhancing audit quality by both challenging and supporting auditors. More visibility of the good work they do would provide reassurance to those unaware of the inbuilt checks on auditor quality and independence. I’ve probably posed more questions than answers but my central theme remains. I don’t believe that we have anything to be defensive about. We have the greatest interest in making sure that any debate about our profession is an informed one. Tell people what you do – they may, at last, find it interesting.

  • Rodger Hughes is the UK head of Assurance and Business Advisory Services at PricewaterhouseCoopers

Related Articles

EY fined £1.8m over Tech Data audit

Accounting Standards EY fined £1.8m over Tech Data audit

1d Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Top 50+50: Firms post significant growth in new tax and audit rankings

Audit Top 50+50: Firms post significant growth in new tax and audit rankings

4d Emma Smith, Managing Editor
FRC closes investigation into PwC over Barclays compliance

Accounting Firms FRC closes investigation into PwC over Barclays compliance

2w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
PwC to audit BBC pay policies following gender pay gap outrage

Accounting Firms PwC to audit BBC pay policies following gender pay gap outrage

1m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
PwC to take over from Deloitte as Diploma auditor

Accounting Firms PwC to take over from Deloitte as Diploma auditor

1m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
KPMG rocked by South African corruption scandal

Audit KPMG rocked by South African corruption scandal

3w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
BDO replaces Deloitte as Mitie auditor

Audit BDO replaces Deloitte as Mitie auditor

4w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
FRC closes KPMG HBOS audit investigation, Treasury Committee expects ‘full explanation’

Accounting Firms FRC closes KPMG HBOS audit investigation, Treasury Committee expects ‘full explanation’

4w Emma Smith, Managing Editor