I read with interest the news article ‘Move to round up cowboy accountants’ (page 2, 16 August) and I wholly support the Montrose firms who are attempting to have the word ‘accountancy’ recognised as a legal term with restricted use.
I am amazed (not) at the attitude of ACCA and ICAS. ACCA thinks it will be a restriction on competition if only qualified accountants can hold themselves out to be called accountants. I would suspect the public at large would consider the term ‘accountant’ to be synonymous with the holding of a recognised accountancy qualification. Are non-qualified accountants who hold themselves out to be accountants therefore not deceiving the public and thereby restricting competition at present?
ICAS believes we use so many descriptions for ourselves that it would be very difficult to legislate to restrict effectively their use. I believe this is nonsense. We are talking about the public and unqualified accountants.
If a taxi driver needs his tax return prepared he will want an ‘accountant’ and may look up ‘accountant’ in yellow pages. An unqualified accountant will be ‘xyz accountants’ for example. Clearly people will be able to circumvent such simple legislation but I suspect simple legislation would go a great way towards helping the public and qualified accountants alike.
As for competent non-qualified accountants, then they may be encouraged to sit exams to reflect their competence.
Just one half of UK practices have implemented a pricing structure around auto enrolment implementation and advice - with many suffering increased costs
Deloitte's north-west Europe foray; BDO, Smith & Williamson investment paths; Shelley Stock Hutter; and Wilkins Kennedy discussed by editor Kevin Reed on our Friday Afternoon Live broadcast
Accountants should alter their perspective on auto-enrolment to maximise business opportunities, according to Eric Clapton.
Kevin Reed discusses whether new accountancy group Cogital can rival the Big Four...and its likely direction of travel