PracticeAccounting FirmsLatest blog entries: a place in the sun

Latest blog entries: a place in the sun

The Big Four is the place to start a career and why HMRC's holiday home ruling has a sting in the tail. It's all in our latest blogs round-up

Accounting hot,
E&Y hottest

It’s official: accounting is hot. That’s according to Business Week’s annual
careers survey.
The Big Four take four of the top five places in the Best Places to Launch a
Career 2008 league table. KPMG is knocked into fifth place by Goldman Sachs,
with PwC third, Deloitte second and E&Y nabbing the top spot.

More surprising though is that despite talk of layoffs by the big firms
elsewhere, the Big Four do so well. But it seems there is little link between
career longevity and an organisation being a good place to start out. After all
investment banks do well too.

accountingmatters.accountancyage.com

Holiday homes,
HMRC’s latest

The recent press release from HM Revenue & Customs in respect of holiday
homes abroad is not necessarily the good news that many believe. It confirms
that individuals who own holiday homes through companies will not suffer a
benefit in kind tax liability due to the company asset being made available to
them. The change in HMRC position applies to all years, including those in the
past. The press release goes onto give details about mechanisms to recover taxes
paid for past periods.
Clearly the concept of the relieving provision is a step in the right direction,
especially if the change is backdated in the favour of the individual. So where
is the ‘sting in the tail’?
HMRC sets outs the conditions that need to be satisfied for no benefit to arise.

One of the conditions is that the property owning company is owned directly by
the individual in question (or his family).

This is important and may be overlooked by some taxpayers. HMRC have
confirmed that the revised legislation is designed to avoid a charge where the
taxpayer may have accidentally suffered one.

As such, indirect ownership of the company shares (e.g. via trusts) is not
exempted by the new relieving legislation and the possibility of a benefit in
kind will continue.

There is also the question of the extent that the foreign entity will be a
company for the purposes of the exemption, because the legislation uses the term
‘company’ and not ‘body corporate’.

I suspect that there will be a good few years of uncertainty as to the extent
that some of the more unusual (and exotic) foreign property ownership vehicles
are a company for these purposes.

Richard Verge,
goodmanjones.net

Related Articles

KPMG replaces PwC as Croda auditor

Accounting Firms KPMG replaces PwC as Croda auditor

1d Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Where is your next client coming from?

Accounting Firms Where is your next client coming from?

3d James Noble, Propero Partners
Specialist VAT service provider joins MHA

Accounting Firms Specialist VAT service provider joins MHA

4d Austin Clark, Reporter
Top 50+50: Big Four hold steady, shake-up outside Top 20

Accounting Firms Top 50+50: Big Four hold steady, shake-up outside Top 20

2w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Top 50+50: Revenue rises spark rankings shake-up

Accounting Firms Top 50+50: Revenue rises spark rankings shake-up

3w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Grant Thornton expands financial services regulatory team

Accounting Firms Grant Thornton expands financial services regulatory team

2w Austin Clark, Reporter
FRC closes investigation into PwC over Barclays compliance

Accounting Firms FRC closes investigation into PwC over Barclays compliance

2w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Top 50+50: Firms fall short on diversity

Accounting Firms Top 50+50: Firms fall short on diversity

2w Alia Shoaib, Reporter