TaxCorporate TaxTax system shifts towards confrontation

Tax system shifts towards confrontation

Imagine it's 2003; you are a client seeking advice about an error you've made in your tax affairs.

Your adviser starts the meeting by warning you that under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, he has to report suspicions or knowledge of tax evasion, or reasonable grounds for this, to the National Criminal Intelligence Service.

You ask what all this is about. You’re told the warning has to be given before the discussion starts – whatever the subject of the meeting. If it was given after you had disclosed possible tax evasion, the tax adviser could be committing the offence of tipping off and be liable to up to five years’ imprisonment.

You thought you were going to talk about sorting tax errors out. If that is automatically equated to evasion and criminal consequences are in the air, perhaps you’ll stay silent and chance it.

It’s a likely scenario. In the next few weeks the Proceeds of Crime Bill goes before Parliament with provisions that could have the above result.

So what? Tax evasion is a crime; people are prosecuted for it. Yes, but usually only in serious cases where they have deliberately concealed matters or lied under investigation; in 1999/2000 there were only 55 Revenue prosecutions.

Others reached settlements.

The Proceeds of Crime Bill puts the future of such settlements – the ‘Hansard’ procedure – in doubt. Many people will think twice before ‘confessing’ if they believe a policeman rather than a tax inspector will come to call.

Of course the Bill is aimed at much more. The prime target is preventing criminals laundering the proceeds of their offences. Especially after the events of 11 September, no-one disputes the need for tough legislation here. Nor do reputable tax advisers wish to see financial crimes treated with leniency.

But the fact remains that we have a very complex tax system where it is easy to get something wrong. The Revenue’s policy of voluntary disclosures recognises that.

If taxpayers don’t have the confidence that disclosure means no prison, either more errors – and evasion – will escape detection, or the Revenue will have to devote more resources to prosecutions. If this happens, our tax system will have shifted massively and disastrously towards confrontation, with tax inspectors, sadly, becoming policemen.

Related Articles

Big names, little tax: Airbnb, Facebook, Kellogg’s, eBay

Corporate Tax Big names, little tax: Airbnb, Facebook, Kellogg’s, eBay

2w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

2w Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
EU divided over radical tax reforms targeting tech giants

Corporate Tax EU divided over radical tax reforms targeting tech giants

3w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

Corporate Tax ‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

1m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Should I incorporate my buy-to-let business?

Corporate Tax Should I incorporate my buy-to-let business?

2m Emma Rawson
‘Improve rather than lose’ disincorporation relief, tax body urges

Administration ‘Improve rather than lose’ disincorporation relief, tax body urges

3w Austin Clark, Reporter
How to educate your clients about tax avoidance

Corporate Tax How to educate your clients about tax avoidance

3w Clear Books | Sponsored
CGT clampdown nets HMRC £124m – but could lead to increase in use of avoidance schemes

Corporate Tax CGT clampdown nets HMRC £124m – but could lead to increase in use of avoidance schemes

4w Austin Clark, Reporter