PracticeAccounting FirmsOPINION

OPINION

A shaky foundation

We learn this week the new accountancy watchdog, the Foundation, will be fully operational by January. Wasn’t that January 2001 you might ask?

Or, as those of you with longer memories might suggest, January 2000?

Well, no. Those deadlines have passed and the new target put in place this week might be met with a certain degree of justifiable scepticism.

More than two years have passed since Lord Gordon Borrie QC, former head of the Office of Fair Trading, was appointed chairman of the Foundation.

That came only after years of negotiations between accountancy bodies and government to end decades of self-regulation.

After that 1 January 2000 deadline was missed we were told the new regime would be up and running by the end of that year. But delays blamed on indecision over funding and constitutional policy meant little happened.

Finally the make-up of the new regime was revealed this July, a welcome breakthrough. But still the powers of regulation rest with the existing institutes.

This really isn’t good enough. With a requirement to include a majority of lay members on each of its bodies, the Foundation was supposed to be a blow for independence: a chance for accountancy to prove it is whiter than white and willing participant in a modern professional regulatory regime.

But delays are tarnishing its image even before launch. Regulatory power has not yet passed to the Foundation. Until it does so, accountancy risks being seen as protectionist. That will only invite further scrutiny from government. And with that comes the risk that accountancy will have less say in its regulatory future.

Will Project Darwin evolve?

Ever since the bulk of the Big Five began moves to divest themselves of their consulting arms, accounting firms have run the risk of seeing themselves cast as tickers and bashers once again.

It may not be the case, but you could forgive the layman for asking that without business consultancy services what is left for accountants apart from tax and audit?

But it’s good to see KPMG insiders acknowledging the problem as they seek to roll out Project Darwin, a project that appears a sound attempt to remove unnecessary tiers of management by automating internal authorisation processes and fostering an entrepreneurial spirit.

With a budget of #16m, the firm is putting its money where its mouth is. It will take more than that to maintain accountancy’s position as a premier career choice, but it’s encouraging nonetheless.

Related Articles

PwC’s five strategic priorities for becoming ‘the leading professional services firm’

Accounting Firms PwC’s five strategic priorities for becoming ‘the leading professional services firm’

3d Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Mazars appoints new partner to accounting and outsourcing team

Accounting Firms Mazars appoints new partner to accounting and outsourcing team

3d Emma Smith, Managing Editor
FRC closes KPMG HBOS audit investigation, Treasury Committee expects ‘full explanation’

Accounting Firms FRC closes KPMG HBOS audit investigation, Treasury Committee expects ‘full explanation’

5d Emma Smith, Managing Editor
KPMG’s apprenticeship intake jumps to 181 in 2017

Accounting Firms KPMG’s apprenticeship intake jumps to 181 in 2017

2w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
284 new trainees join BDO

Accounting Firms 284 new trainees join BDO

2w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
PwC publishes 12.8% BAME pay gap

Accounting Firms PwC publishes 12.8% BAME pay gap

6d Emma Smith, Managing Editor
RSM recruits 288 trainees

Accounting Firms RSM recruits 288 trainees

1w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Deloitte global revenues hit record $38.8bn

Accounting Firms Deloitte global revenues hit record $38.8bn

1w Emma Smith, Managing Editor