TaxPersonal TaxActor Tim Healy faces tax bill following FTT re-run

Actor Tim Healy faces tax bill following FTT re-run

In a fresh hearing in the first-tier tax tribunal, actor Tim Healy's claims for relief on his living expenses are thrown out

Actor Tim Healy faces tax bill following FTT re-run

AUF WIEDERSEHEN, PET! actor Tim Healy faces the prospect of a hefty tax bill after the first-tier tax tribunal for the second time heard a case relating to expenses claimed during his stint in West End musical Billy Elliot between December 2004 and December 2005.

Healy, who lives in Cheshire, had initially claimed a partial victory after his claim for £32,503 in accommodation expenses was found to be “wholly and exclusively for the purposes of his profession”, and therefore tax deductible. He failed, though, to prove expenses on subsistence at £4,094 and taxi fares at £4,080 fell within that remit, and so lost on those claims. 

The upper-tier tribunal “set aside” the decision and “remitted” the case back to the first-tier tribunal to be heard afresh.

In this latest hearing, Healy chose not to contest the original findings on his subsistence and taxi fares, but his claim for accommodation fees was struck out as he had chosen to stay in a three bedroom flat so as to have guests.

Nichola Ross Martin, the founder of Ross Martin Tax Consultancy, who advised Healy on the case, said: “Despite what HMRC tried to argue, the message that came down from the earlier upper tribunal hearing and is backed up by this deicision is pretty clear when it comes to accommodation costs.

“These costs may well be allowable, but they will be decided on a case-by-case basis, according to their facts. The law sets no limit as to how long one can be away from home to obtain tax relief. It may be one night, or as in this case even nine months. Healy’s admission that when choosing his accommodation, the consideration of chosing accommodation with the intention of having his guests to stay was the single factor that sealed his fate.

“Hindsight is a wonderful thing: if he had chosen a flat with a single bedroom, the question of guests would not have arisen. Had he also retained receipts for his expenditure on subsistence, things might have gone in his favour.”

Related Articles

HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

Personal Tax HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

1w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
HMRC tax evasion assistance requests double in five years

Corporate Tax HMRC tax evasion assistance requests double in five years

4m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Rangers tax case to have ‘dramatic’ consequences for football and business

Legal Rangers tax case to have ‘dramatic’ consequences for football and business

4m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Finance Bill 2017: Corporate tax reporting requirements 'a burden'

Business Regulation Finance Bill 2017: Corporate tax reporting requirements 'a burden'

11m Stephanie Wix, Writer
PAC raises “serious concerns” about HMRC’s digital plans

Corporate Tax PAC raises “serious concerns” about HMRC’s digital plans

11m Stephanie Wix, Writer
HMRC collects record £5bn in inheritance tax

HMRC HMRC collects record £5bn in inheritance tax

4m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
The top three issues that the next government must address for accountants

Making Tax Digital The top three issues that the next government must address for accountants

5m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
HMRC cuts over 150 offices to reduce running costs

Corporate Tax HMRC cuts over 150 offices to reduce running costs

9m Stephanie Wix, Writer