RegulationAccounting StandardsICAEW: No disciplinaries yet against tax avoidance advisers

ICAEW: No disciplinaries yet against tax avoidance advisers

ICAEW yet to haul any members through disciplinary action for advising on tax avoidance, as institute says "little information" received from HMRC

THE ICAEW has yet to discipline any members for advising clients on aggressive tax avoidance schemes, despite setting a strong stance against such behaviour three years ago, the institute has confirmed to Accountancy Age.

In 2012, the ICAEW announced members advising on schemes that could be interpreted as aggressive could be held to be bringing the profession into disrepute.

The institute’s helpsheet which accompanied the announcement set out the hallmarks of avoidance schemes to consider for ICAEW members and warned that contrived tax planning is potentially against its code of ethics, despite earlier concerns from practitioners that they could be held negligent if they fail to draw clients’ attention to all available options.

And while the institute is “currently looking at a few cases with regard to tax advice”, none have yet resulted in disciplinary proceedings being brought against a member.

The institute can only investigate members if a complaint is made, for example from HMRC, or there is sufficient evidence in the public domain to justify an investigation.

But to date, HMRC has passed the ICAEW “little information that we have been able to act on”, an institute spokeswoman said in a statement to Accountancy Age.

She added it is “in dialogue with HMRC to ensure that, as a regulator, we are made aware of cases where the behaviour of our members when it comes to tax advice is not of the highest professional and ethical standards and they believe there is a case to answer”.

The news comes as pressure mounts for greater regulation of tax advisers to be brought in, with the Treasury publishing a document this month “asking the regulatory bodies who police professional standards to take on a greater lead and responsibility in setting and enforcing clear professional standards around the facilitation and promotion of avoidance”.

The question of a new code of conduct was raised in February by the Public Accounts Committee, which accused PwC and other large accountancy firms of helping multinational companies to drive down their tax bills to negligible levels by funnelling their UK profits through low-tax jurisdictions offshore.

The committee this week noted its “disappointment” in HMRC after it rejected the need for a tougher code of conduct for tax advisers.

HMRC’s position is “out of kilter with its wider policy to clamp down on aggressive tax avoidance,” the committee said.

Accountancy Age has requested comment from HMRC.

Related Articles

Accountants shouldn’t neglect hybrid mismatch anti-avoidance rules

Accounting Standards Accountants shouldn’t neglect hybrid mismatch anti-avoidance rules

4m Alison Conley
Treasury Select Committee report released on Making Tax Digital

Accounting Standards Treasury Select Committee report released on Making Tax Digital

10m Stephanie Wix, Writer
Making Tax Digital: the "unexpected item in the bagging area"

Accounting Standards Making Tax Digital: the "unexpected item in the bagging area"

11m Stephanie Wix, Writer
'Clear' tax avoidance guidance for advisers issued by institutes

Accounting Standards 'Clear' tax avoidance guidance for advisers issued by institutes

1y Stephanie Wix, Writer
Eight landmarks in the history of accountancy

Accounting Standards Eight landmarks in the history of accountancy

1y Acccountancy Age
New Year Honours of 2017

Accounting Standards New Year Honours of 2017

11m Stephanie Wix, Writer
ACCA announces partnership with RD Tax Solutions

Accounting Standards ACCA announces partnership with RD Tax Solutions

12m Stephanie Wix, Writer
Record fine for Deloitte and audit partner over Aero misconduct

Accounting Standards Record fine for Deloitte and audit partner over Aero misconduct

1y Stephanie Wix, Writer