BusinessBusiness RecoveryCompanies on the brink of bankruptcy warned of AE obligations

Companies on the brink of bankruptcy warned of AE obligations

Insolvent businesses will still have to auto-enrol their employees onto pensions schemes

Companies on the brink of bankruptcy warned of AE obligations

BUSINESSES facing insolvency still have to meet their auto-enrolment (AE) obligations where they continue to employ staff, sister publication Professional Pensions reports.

Kate Lloyd, partner at law firm Gateley, raised concern that insolvency practitioners (IP) who decide to keep trading the business while searching for a buyer might let AE drop down the list of their priorities.

She said: “Given the severity of the penalties that can be imposed, running into many thousands of pounds, it is something that IPs should have on their radar.

“For example, if the company hasn’t reached its staging date but does reach it once the IP is on board, it is the IP who is responsible for making sure that the auto-enrolment obligations are met and that could be something that easily slips through the net.”

Lloyd added that the IP would need to be aware of the employer contribution requirements, which may exceed their previous pension expenses.

She said: “In the example just given, the IP would have to fund from the business currently a 1% employer contribution in respect of the employees and this may be more than the pensions costs were prior to the auto-enrolment requirements applying.”

The Pensions Regulator (TPR) said it expected IPs to ensure their employer client was compliant with any duties it had under AE legislation.

A spokesman for the regulator said: “In line with our compliance and enforcement strategy, the regulator takes a risk based approach to enforcing the duties with all employers including with those undergoing insolvency.

“We aim to educate and enable employers to comply in the first instance and will work with them to get them back on track if they are experiencing difficulties.”

Hogan Lovells counsel Nicola Rondel pointed out that IPs were rarely assigned to keep a company afloat, however.

She said: “Nine times out of ten an insolvency practitioner will be appointed for the sole purpose of winding up the company or better realising assets or returns for creditors.

“In both those contexts you can see that it wouldn’t really be a priority or even something they should be thinking about doing – auto-enrolling employees – because that would run counter to the purpose for which they have been appointed.”

Related Articles

Insolvency Service to probe BHS director behaviour

Business Recovery Insolvency Service to probe BHS director behaviour

1y Chris Warmoll, Writer
PwC leads £675m Lehman pension deal

Business Recovery PwC leads £675m Lehman pension deal

2y Richard Crump, Writer
Lehman Brothers pension scheme payout agreed

Business Recovery Lehman Brothers pension scheme payout agreed

3y Jack Jones, Writer
Court reduces risk of scheme deficits triggering insolvency

Business Recovery Court reduces risk of scheme deficits triggering insolvency

4y Jack Jones, Writer
Pensions regulator to slam Silentnight following pre-pack

Business Recovery Pensions regulator to slam Silentnight following pre-pack

4y Jack Jones & Rachael Singh
Administrations freed from pension liability chains

Business Recovery Administrations freed from pension liability chains

4y Neil Smyth
Better pension payoff for longer workers in company insolvency

Business Recovery Better pension payoff for longer workers in company insolvency

4y Kevin Reed, Writer
Lehman administrators in Supreme Court over pension payments

Business Recovery Lehman administrators in Supreme Court over pension payments

4y Rachael Singh, Writer