SFO agree £1.5m deal in final Tchenguiz brothers raids claim

SFO agree £1.5m deal in final Tchenguiz brothers raids claim

Agency will pay Robert Tchenguiz £1.5m plus costs to settle case, after agreeing a separate £3m award with brother Vincent

THE SERIOUS FRAUD OFFICE has agreed a £1.5m settlement with Robert Tchenguiz, relating to its failed investigation into the collapse of Icelandic bank Kaupthing.

Tchenguiz (pictured, right) and his brother Vincent (pictured, left) were subject to an SFO probe that led to dawn raids against their premises in March 2011. The High Court subsequently quashed the SFO’s search warrants and criticised its conduct throughout the botched inquiry.

Last week, the agency confirmed it had reached a settlement with Vincent, paying £3m plus legal costs. It has now reached an agreement with Robert and his R20 business, meaning a planned trial scheduled for October 2014 will not go ahead.

SFO director David Green said he was pleased to bring the civil cases to a close before court proceedings began.

He said: “The SFO deeply regrets the errors for which we were criticised by the High Court in July 2012. On behalf of the SFO, I also apologise to Robert Tchenguiz for what happened to him.

“I reiterate that the SFO has changed a great deal since March 2011, and I am determined that the mistakes made over three years ago will not be repeated.”

The Tchenguiz brothers were targeted by the SFO over the running of holding company Oscatello, one of Kaupthing’s largest debtors at the time of its collapse. It was later revealed that the March 2011 search warrants relied heavily on documents provided by Grant Thornton, whose liquidators Steve Akers and Mark McDonald were representing Oscatello.

Following his settlement with the SFO, Vincent said he would consider bringing civil and private criminal action against Grant Thornton, on the basis that the SFO had “had unofficially outsourced its investigation” to the firm.

A Grant Thornton spokesperson denied it had advised the SFO in its investigation, adding the firm had “acted appropriately, and in accordance with its professional responsibilities and legal obligations” at all times.

Share

Subscribe to get your daily business insights

Resources & Whitepapers

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata
Professional Services

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata

3y

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folde...

In the past decade, the professional services industry has transformed significantly. Digital disruptions, increased competition, and changing market ...

View resource
2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

3y

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professi...

In recent months, professional services firms are facing more pressure than ever to deliver value to clients. Often, clients look at the firms own inf...

View resource
Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine
Accounting Firms

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

3y

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

In a world of instant results and automated workloads, the potential for AP to drive insights and transform results is enormous. But, if you’re still ...

View resource
Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021
Making Tax Digital

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

3y

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

The first phase of Making Tax Digital (MTD) saw the requirement for the digital submission of the VAT Return using compliant software. That’s now behi...

View resource