USERS of tax avoidance schemes are to be compelled to pay their tax bills upfront while HM Revenue & Customs conducts investigations into their arrangements, under proposals announced by the Treasury.
The consultation will look at proposals to include any disputed tax associated with schemes that are subject to the Disclosure of Tax Avoidance Schemes (DOTAS) regime and taxpayers engaging in the most abusive tax avoidance and therefore being investigated under the government’s General Anti-Abuse Rule (GAAR).
The move will eliminate the tactic some employ of holding onto disputed tax while their case is investigated and litigated, which can take years.
As things stand, HMRC currently wins 80% of tax disputes that it litigates.
Although not changing fundamental tax rules, the move will significantly shift the economic balance and boost HMRC’s chances in resolving the approximately 65,000 cases it is currently investigating.
It is also thought it will act as a deterrent to those tempted to exploit the cashflow advantage allowed by the current rules.
At present, taxpayers must make a disclosure to the taxman when they enter a tax avoidance scheme, and in doing so accept HMRC may investigate and challenge it.
Taxpayers will be free to continue to make their case to the tribunal or court and, if successful, their money will be returned with interest.
Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury David Gauke (pictured) said: “The government has been absolutely clear that we will not tolerate aggressive tax avoidance and will take action to make sure people pay the taxes that are due. While the vast majority of taxpayers play by the rules, there is still a minority who will engage in artificial schemes as a way to avoid their responsibilities.
“The consultation we are publishing today will not only seek to remove the advantage that tax avoidance schemes users have; it will send a clear message to anyone thinking of using these schemes to avoid paying the tax that is due – tax avoidance doesn’t pay.”
HMRC has outlined a change in VAT policy to the treatment of dwellings that have been formed from either the construction of new buildings, or from the conversion of non-residential buildings
Let us hope that valuable asset protection vehicles are not made prohibitively burdensome or abolished in the desire to “simplify” IHT
The government is pressing ahead with changes to the way it taxes individuals with a foreign domicile
I will feel slightly awkward when I write to the client who is about to receive a large invoice from the PAYE expert, offering him the fee protection going forward