PracticeAccounting FirmsAS2013: What the practitioners say

AS2013: What the practitioners say

A round-up of accountancy's reaction to the chancellor's Autumn Statement

AS WAS EXPECTED, this week’s Autumn Statement was short on entrance music, pyrotechnics and, indeed, excitement.

Although largely content-free, there were kernels of issues for practitioners to take note of and, depending on the detail of the Finance Bill, act on.

Chief among them were changes to more tightly tax partnerships, which PwC tax director Mark Saunders noted “moves the bar much higher than expected”.

He added there is a danger new rules could tread on the toes of legitimate measures: “In some professions, such as the legal sector, there are good commercial reasons why someone has the title of partner without having a real equity stake in the business”, he said.

The changes, too, to the way tax avoidance schemes are challenged could have a significant impact on practitioners, with rules to be introduced that will force taxpayers to pay up during the dispute.

MHA MacIntyre Hudson tax partner Alastair Kendrick expects the move will see a windfall for HMRC. He said: “There are a significant number of people who have acquired these schemes who are holding off making any payment. This I guess (subject to wording) will create a windfall for the government and many having paid the liability may decide against taking forward any fight.”

The well-trailed taxation of property owned by non-UK residents drew few gasps, although Deloitte’s Bill Dodwell warned the “piecemeal” way in which the change is to be introduced could be something we “regret”.

Similarly, extended tax reliefs for the film industry were expected, something KPMG’s head of tax policy Chris Morgan described as “great news for the UK”, although some are disappointed it does not take in video games.

As for business more widely, the cap on business rates have been well-received, and EY’s global head of tax policy Chris Sanger said the 2% curb shows the chancellor has taken note of companies’ grievances. He said: “The chancellor has shown that he has been listening to the pain felt by businesses through a system that has its origins in the Poor Laws of 1601 and was updated in 1990 alongside the introduction of the poll tax.”

Related Articles

Top 50+50: Firms fall short on diversity

Accounting Firms Top 50+50: Firms fall short on diversity

2w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Are you prepared for the £1 changeover?

Accounting Firms Are you prepared for the £1 changeover?

3m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Friday Afternoon Live: Discussing the aims and intent of Connolly-driven CogitalGroup

Accounting Firms Friday Afternoon Live: Discussing the aims and intent of Connolly-driven CogitalGroup

1y Kevin Reed, Writer
How accountancy firms are responding to Brexit

Accounting Firms How accountancy firms are responding to Brexit

1y Michelle Pery
PwC expands return to work scheme

Accounting Firms PwC expands return to work scheme

1y Richard Crump, Writer
Leader: Why Connolly's new venture is unlikely to chase Big Four; or follow failed consolidator model

Accounting Firms Leader: Why Connolly's new venture is unlikely to chase Big Four; or follow failed consolidator model

1y Kevin Reed, Writer
Former Deloitte boss and HgCapital launch CogitalGroup

Accounting Firms Former Deloitte boss and HgCapital launch CogitalGroup

1y Richard Crump, Writer
Former Deloitte boss John Connolly plots 'rival' to Big Four

Accounting Firms Former Deloitte boss John Connolly plots 'rival' to Big Four

1y Richard Crump, Writer