BusinessBusiness RecoveryAction against unlawful “phoenix” companies doubles

Action against unlawful “phoenix” companies doubles

The number of cases launched against company directors involving 'phoenix companies' doubles in 12 months

ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY against directors of companies that have undergone liquidation and re-established as ‘phoenix companies’ under the same name has doubled in the last year, according to figures produced by law firm RPC.

In 2012/13, the Insolvency Service took action in 163 cases where companies used names of recently-liquidated businesses, up from just 85 the year before.

Insolvency rules introduced in 1986 were overhauled in the 2002 Enterprise Act to make it easier to rescue insolvent companies from going under and reduce the numbers going into liquidation.

Business secretary Vince Cable recently put forward proposals to place greater culpability on the shoulders of directors, amid concerns over opacity in company ownership.

The proposals would see a central registry introduced detailing individuals with more than 25% of company shares. Additionally, courts will be given more powers to consider the impact of directors’ actions on society more widely, as well as previous failures, when considering director disqualification.

RPC partner Vivien Tyrell said: “This massive increase in enforcement activity against directors of unlawful phoenix companies shows just how many people still think they can simply offload their debts and yet carry on what is effectively the same business without anyone noticing. It’s very concerning, given that this has been an offence for more than 25 years.

“Company directors that do this are seeking to capitalise on the customer base, brand currency and goodwill of a previous business but leave behind their financial obligations, rising totally unscathed from the ashes of insolvency. This isn’t fair on creditors, competitors or customers, so it’s encouraging to see that breaches of the rules are being clamped down on.”

Insolvency practitioners are alive to the issue, Tyrell added, and have developed strong communication lines to report suspected breaches to the Insolvency Service, for whom targeting unlawful phoenix companies is quite an easy enforcement “win” as it is “not hard to prove that a name is being re-used unlawfully”.

Related Articles

How to avoid a Carillion collapse

Business Recovery How to avoid a Carillion collapse

4w Russell-Cooke
Carillion collapse: The week so far and industry reaction

Business Recovery Carillion collapse: The week so far and industry reaction

1m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Carillion: PwC appointed as special managers – what happens now?

Business Recovery Carillion: PwC appointed as special managers – what happens now?

1m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Investment firm acquires Avon Steel Company Limited

Business Recovery Investment firm acquires Avon Steel Company Limited

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Manchester law firm enters into administration

Business Recovery Manchester law firm enters into administration

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
KPMG appoints new global head of insolvency

Business Recovery KPMG appoints new global head of insolvency

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Using insolvency as a debt recovery tool

Business Recovery Using insolvency as a debt recovery tool

8m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Kingston Smith liquidators to distribute millions to Bond International Software PLC members

Accounting Firms Kingston Smith liquidators to distribute millions to Bond International Software PLC members

1y Stephanie Wix, Writer