TaxCorporate TaxMPs accuse Prince of tax dodging in hearing

MPs accuse Prince of tax dodging in hearing

MPs in the Public Accounts Committee challenge the fairness of the Duchy of Cornwall's tax arrangements

MPs accuse Prince of tax dodging in hearing

PRINCE CHARLES is using his Duchy of Cornwall to escape taxes, according to a parliamentary Public Accounts Committee hearing held yesterday.

The duchy, a private estate established in 1337 in order to provide the heir to the throne with a private income, pays no corporation tax or capital gains tax due to a memorandum of understanding on Royal taxation struck between government and the Crown in 1993.

Duchy finance director Keith Willis’ argument that the estate’s corporation tax exemption was justified by the low amounts paid by other companies drew an incredulous response from committee chair Margaret Hodge, who said it was “shocking, shocking, shocking”.

The prince’s principal private secretary William Nye appeared before the PAC in order to give evidence on the royal’s accounts. He was accompanied by Willis and the Treasury’s officer for accounts Paula Diggle.

The estate, Nye said, is not a corporation, and as such is not liable to corporation tax, despite committee chair Margaret Hodge insisting it “has all the features of a corporation”.

“Essentially it’s a set of properties that belong to the Duke of Cornwall. The fact that it’s a large set of properties doesn’t mean it is a corporation,” Nye told the MPs.

There is “an issue of fairness and level playing fields”, in the duchy making investments without having to pay corporation tax and capital gains tax as other businesses do, Hodge told Nye, something he refuted.

While the estate is an “unusual” entity, Nye said, he repeatedly returned to the fact Prince Charles, as the duke, voluntarily pays income tax at the highest rate on the earnings he generates from it, after deducting expenses.

“It is a private landed estate,” Nye said. “He [Charles] manages it and he is responsible for running it. He receives an income but the assets of the estate he has to manage for future generations.”

Related Articles

Q&A with the Financial Secretary to the Treasury

Corporate Tax Q&A with the Financial Secretary to the Treasury

4m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Markets expected to respond positively to US policy changes

Corporate Tax Markets expected to respond positively to US policy changes

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Government looks to close tax loophole on staff benefits

Corporate Tax Government looks to close tax loophole on staff benefits

1y AccountancyAge staff
Budget 2016: More HMRC staff and £71m promised to boost digital tax roll-out

Corporate Tax Budget 2016: More HMRC staff and £71m promised to boost digital tax roll-out

2y Chris Warmoll, Writer
Tax breaks needed to save UK oil industry, urges trade body

Corporate Tax Tax breaks needed to save UK oil industry, urges trade body

2y Fraser Simpson, Reporter
UK has ‘vital role to play’ in beating tax evasion, declares Panama Papers whistleblower

Corporate Tax UK has ‘vital role to play’ in beating tax evasion, declares Panama Papers whistleblower

1y Fraser Simpson, Reporter
An 'incomprehensible and contradictory' Budget

Accounting Firms An 'incomprehensible and contradictory' Budget

2y Richard Crump, Writer
Budget 2016: Bittersweet budget paves the way for sugar tax

Corporate Tax Budget 2016: Bittersweet budget paves the way for sugar tax

2y Chris Warmoll, Writer