FRC dismisses enhanced audit competition role

FRC dismisses enhanced audit competition role

Reporting watchdog questions usefulness of secondary duty of promoting competition between audit firms

THE FRC has distanced itself from plans that would see it charged with promoting competition between audit firms – because it fails to fit into its constitution.

In a letter sent to the Competition Commission, which mooted the proposal earlier this month, FRC chief executive Stephen Haddrill [pictured] said extending the remit of the reporting watchdog’s work would not enhance competition or be cost-effective.

Following its provisional findings of an investigation into the FTSE 350 audit market, the Competition Commission had proposed handing the FRC a “secondary duty” to tackle the lack of competition among auditors by reporting on firms’ work in a way that promotes competition.

However, Haddrill questioned the usefulness of the FRC being given a secondary duty, and warned it could not be put in a position where it felt “pressure to hold back from regulatory action against a firm” because it would damage the firm’s reputation and ability to compete in the market.

“As we are not established as a statutory body with statutory objective, a competition duty would not fit well into our constitution,” Haddrill said.

Such a change would also prove expensive, Haddrill argued. In order to achieve a selection of audits that was representative of the Big Four the FRC would need to undertake nearly 200 inspections, six times as many as present. Inspections for smaller company audits would also have to increase to around 250, two and a half times the current level. As a result, total inspection costs would rise to £9m from £3.5m.

In addition, Haddrill said comparative samples could not be made for the likes of Grant Thornton and BDO, as non-Big Four firms only audit 13 companies in the FTSE 350.

“We would have to explain that our reports on those firms were unrepresentative and probably therefore do more harm than good,” the letter said.

Related Articles

KPMG, Deloitte and the audit dilemma

Audit KPMG, Deloitte and the audit dilemma

1m Emanuela Hawker, Reporter
IAASB announces proposed ISA 315 changes

Audit IAASB announces proposed ISA 315 changes

1m Emanuela Hawker, Reporter
FRC shout for independence, viability and higher quality in the UK audit market

Audit FRC shout for independence, viability and higher quality in the UK audit market

2m Lucy Skoulding, Reporter
Fined by FRC: Grant Thornton next in the firing line

Audit Fined by FRC: Grant Thornton next in the firing line

3m Emanuela Hawker, Reporter
FRC competence review leaves watchdog on tenterhooks

Audit FRC competence review leaves watchdog on tenterhooks

4m Lucy Skoulding, Reporter
KPMG fined and reprimanded over Ted Baker audits

Audit KPMG fined and reprimanded over Ted Baker audits

4m Lucy Skoulding, Reporter
FRC data on Big Four audits may highlight need for industry overhaul

Audit FRC data on Big Four audits may highlight need for industry overhaul

4m Lucy Skoulding, Reporter
FRC finds audit failures in UK pension scheme reporting

Audit FRC finds audit failures in UK pension scheme reporting

5m Lucy Skoulding, Reporter