PracticeAuditFRC draws line between internal and external audit staff

FRC draws line between internal and external audit staff

External auditors told to stay away from internal ones in a bid to safeguard against conflicts of interest

THE FINANCIAL WATCHDOG has issued guidance which will completely separate the internal and external audit teams.

The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) has now prohibited external auditors from seeking help or guidance from a company’s internal audit team when compiling an audit report.

According to the FRC the latest move creates a clearer division of responsibility between internal and external audit teams to safeguard against conflicts of interest.

However, some in the profession dispute this and believe that internal audit help is not a “real threat” to the independence of the external auditor.

“The provision of direct assistance to external auditors has not been an area of concern for company stakeholders to date. Restricted direct assistance is a reasonably common feature of current external audit practice and it has not impaired audit quality,” said Hywel Ball, head of assurance at Ernst & Young UK and Ireland.

Adding that: “Introducing this prohibition now will add complexity to the planning of multi-location audits.” 

Nick Land, (pictured) FRC board member and chairman of the audit and assurance council, said: “Prohibiting direct assistance supports stakeholders’ expectation that external auditors should be free from threats to their independence.

“In determining the effective date of the prohibition, the FRC has taken into consideration that planning the use of the work of internal auditors may take place early in the financial period being reported on.”

Earlier this week the Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards (PCBS) set up by the government published a damning report on auditors.

The PCBS said that auditors had failed in their duty to expose the risks accumulating on banks’ balance sheets and acted as “cheerleaders” for questionable reporting practices.

“At best, auditors did not act as the last line of defence against banks’ questionable reporting on their own businesses and, at worst, they were cheerleaders for it,” the report said.

 

Related Articles

The ‘uncomfortable truth’ behind FRC’s Big Four fines recommendations

Audit The ‘uncomfortable truth’ behind FRC’s Big Four fines recommendations

5d Carl Johnson, Stephensons
FRC urged to fine Big Four firms penalties over £10m

Audit FRC urged to fine Big Four firms penalties over £10m

3w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
FRC closes investigation into PwC over Barclays compliance

Accounting Firms FRC closes investigation into PwC over Barclays compliance

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
FRC closes KPMG HBOS audit investigation, Treasury Committee expects ‘full explanation’

Accounting Firms FRC closes KPMG HBOS audit investigation, Treasury Committee expects ‘full explanation’

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
PwC fined a record £5.1m by the FRC over RSM Tenon audit

Audit PwC fined a record £5.1m by the FRC over RSM Tenon audit

4m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
BDO overtakes KPMG to take top spot in AIM auditor rankings

Accounting Firms BDO overtakes KPMG to take top spot in AIM auditor rankings

4m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Demand for audit skills exceeding supply

Audit Demand for audit skills exceeding supply

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
FRC launches investigation into PwC over BT audits

Accounting Firms FRC launches investigation into PwC over BT audits

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter