TaxCorporate TaxHMRC “must be more aggressive and assertive”, Hodge tells Lords

HMRC “must be more aggressive and assertive”, Hodge tells Lords

HMRC must challenge more businesses and tax avoidance schemes more aggressively, according chair of the Public Accounts Committee Margaret Hodge

HMRC “must be more aggressive and assertive”, Hodge tells Lords

HM REVENUE & CUSTOMS needs to take a tougher stance against tax avoidance arrangements used by multinational corporations and big business, chair of the Public Accounts Committee Margaret Hodge told lords.

Appearing before the House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee, Hodge (pictured) said her committee had “shone a spotlight” on the tax affairs of large companies, adding she was “not sure that HMRC is battling away behind closed doors to get the best deal on my behalf, the taxpayer.”

Hodge has attracted significant media attention over the past year for intense criticism of HMRC and the tax activities of businesses and wealthy individuals, often citing morality in cases where tax structures are legal.

In particular, she has heavily criticised Google, Amazon and Starbucks for their use of offshore jurisdictions to drive down their UK tax liabilities. In a Public Accounts Committee hearing in November last year, she branded their practices “immoral”, and in a more recent hearing described Google as “evil”, in reference to the company’s mantra “don’t be evil”.

“I talk about morality to raise the temperature of the debate, and I do that unashamedly”, she told the lords.

She went on to say the tax system ought to be simpler, and international law should reflect today’s technology.

“I honestly don’t get it, and if I can’t get it, I’m sure most members of the public can’t either,” Hodge said.

Evidence was also taken from the tax partners of law firms Berwin Leighton Paisner, Slaughter & May and Macfarlanes, who argued HMRC should not be assertive for the sake of it. The department’s processes are thorough and effective, they added.

While Hodge opened her evidence with a declaration that she “did not agree with much” of the lawyers’ evidence, Slaughter & May’s Steve Edge insisted it was better for the tax authorities to “seek the right answer, rather than a simple, clumsy wrong answer”.

“Multinationals are aware of social responsibility,” he said. “Transparency for transparency’s sake does not inform.”

When asked if the relationship between big business and HMRC was “too cosy”, Edge said that HMRC must strike the right balance, and there was “less tax avoidance in the UK than in a long time”.

BLP partner Gary Richards said HMRC was incentivised to scrutinise companies, and took its research “quite carefully”.

Related Articles

Big names, little tax: Airbnb, Facebook, Kellogg’s, eBay

Corporate Tax Big names, little tax: Airbnb, Facebook, Kellogg’s, eBay

1w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
EU divided over radical tax reforms targeting tech giants

Corporate Tax EU divided over radical tax reforms targeting tech giants

2w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
How to educate your clients about tax avoidance

Corporate Tax How to educate your clients about tax avoidance

3w Clear Books | Sponsored
Autumn Statement: Investment and tax avoidance highlighted in Hammond's speech

Corporate Tax Autumn Statement: Investment and tax avoidance highlighted in Hammond's speech

11m Kevin Reed, Writer
Colin: Tell them about the money, mummy

Business Regulation Colin: Tell them about the money, mummy

11m Taking Stock
CGT clampdown nets HMRC £124m – but could lead to increase in use of avoidance schemes

Corporate Tax CGT clampdown nets HMRC £124m – but could lead to increase in use of avoidance schemes

3w Austin Clark, Reporter
‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

Corporate Tax ‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

1m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Markets expected to respond positively to US policy changes

Corporate Tax Markets expected to respond positively to US policy changes

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter