TaxCorporate Tax£10m masterpiece qualifies as ‘plant and machinery’, tribunal rules

£10m masterpiece qualifies as ‘plant and machinery’, tribunal rules

Capital gains tax is not chargeable on the sale of Sir Joshua Reynolds' 'Omai' portrait as it was part of the running of a stately home, a tribunal rules

A MASTERPIECE by Sir Joshua Reynolds at the centre of a tax tussle may be treated as ‘plant and machinery’ by its custodians at Howard Castle in Yorkshire, therefore exempting it from capital gains tax, a tribunal has ruled.

HMRC had been looking to levy capital gains tax on the £9.4m hammer price of ‘Omai’, a portrait depicting one of the first Pacific Islanders to visit Europe which had hung on the walls of the castle and was sold by Simon Howard.

The picture, part of the estate of George Howard, has seen his executors battling HM Revenue & Customs through the tax tribunals.

The executors argued the painting should be treated as plant and machinery in that it had been part of the running of the house and attracted visitors to Howard Castle.

The decision by the Royal Courts of Justice means no tax is payable on its sale at Sotheby’s more than ten years ago, with Mr Justice Morgan accepting the piece should be viewed as “functional apparatus” and a “wasting asset” that, at least in theory, became worthless 50 years after it was put on public display in the 1950s, even though its value has in fact appreciated since then.

Technical manager at Portal Tax Claims Jeanette Edmiston said: “The ruling might shock art lovers but in fact it is not surprising. There is a precedent in tax law for paintings and sculptures being deemed ‘plant and machinery’ used within a business, for instance if they contribute to creating the desired ambiance within a restaurant or bring visitors to a particular attraction – as in the case of the Omai, the Howard Castle.

“This ruling should be a wake-up call for businesses up and down the land. Your expenditure on art on your walls or indeed sophisticated lighting systems used to showcase the work to its best advantage could well give you a sizeable tax claim to make.”

Related Articles

Bid to cut VAT bill on wedding venue hire rejected by Tribunal

Administration Bid to cut VAT bill on wedding venue hire rejected by Tribunal

1y Richard Crump, Writer
An 'incomprehensible and contradictory' Budget

Accounting Firms An 'incomprehensible and contradictory' Budget

2y Richard Crump, Writer
Budget 2016: Four Budget announcements sure to help UK business

Corporate Tax Budget 2016: Four Budget announcements sure to help UK business

2y Richard Godmon
Tribunal denies Freemasons appeal for VAT exemption

Corporate Tax Tribunal denies Freemasons appeal for VAT exemption

2y Calum Fuller, Reporter
Friday Afternoon Live: Rangers tax case and HMRC closures

Corporate Tax Friday Afternoon Live: Rangers tax case and HMRC closures

2y Accountancy Age, Reporters
Taking Stock: HMRC turns to Wikipedia in its search for answers

Corporate Tax Taking Stock: HMRC turns to Wikipedia in its search for answers

2y Taking Stock
Ingenious film tax scheme investors win appeal right against HMRC

Corporate Tax Ingenious film tax scheme investors win appeal right against HMRC

2y Calum Fuller, Reporter
Colin: A VAT-onic order

Corporate Tax Colin: A VAT-onic order

2y Taking Stock