THE BUSINESS TAX regime should be scrapped and replaced with a “lowish” tax on distributed income, according to City AM editor Allister Heath.
Writing in the Telegraph, Heath calls the current system of business taxation “mad and indefensible”, with corporation tax being particularly unfair due to the offsets that some companies can make against their profits.
His comments come in the wake of multinationals’ appearance in front of the Public Accounts Committee, including Starbucks (pictured), over concerns that they use complex structures and techniques to avoid tax.
“The result is an incoherent, nightmarish tax that is clearly not fit for purpose and increasingly regular show trials, where legislators berate companies for following their own legislation but are unable to suggest any sensible reforms,” said Heath.
Instead, a levy on income distributed to investors, which would include dividends, share buy-backs and interest payments, should replace the current business tax regime.
“This new levy would capture and tax just once all income generated from UK-based economic activity, dramatically reducing avoidance as well as the present double, triple or even quadruple taxation,” said Heath.
“Cash flows to investors from UK-generated activity would be taxed, not ‘profits’, so incentives to manipulate would disappear.”
A ruling from the European Commission could force Apple to pay billions of euros in back taxes over the company’s tax arrangements with the Irish government
Freelancers and micro-businesses still need more information about the government’s plans to make tax digital
New dividend tax is an attack on small business owners and is acting against the best interests of the UK economy, warns Top 50 accountants, Bishop Fleming
The Treasury is consulting on how businesses remunerate their staff to assess whether companies are artificially using benefits in kind to avoid tax