TaxCorporate TaxOECD sets ‘test’ to stamp out international tax avoidance

OECD sets 'test' to stamp out international tax avoidance

The OECD attempts to clarify as it clamps down on tax avoidance through treaty shopping

OECD sets ‘test’ to stamp out international tax avoidance

RULES designed to prevent international tax avoidance have been updated by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

An OECD party on fiscal affairs has been working to clarify beneficial ownership of dividends, interest and royalties since 2008, and has devised a test in order to establish beneficiaries.

The test aims to prevent parties from sidestepping withholding taxes as a result of double-tax treaties in force between their countries.

Often, those attempting to avoid any withholding tax use what is known as a ‘conduit arrangement’ or ‘treaty shopping’, where the payment is made through an intermediary entity in a jurisdiction with more favourable tax conditions.

Instead, the test defines the beneficial owner as an entity which has “the right to use and enjoy” the payments and “pay it on”.

In recent years, there has been uncertainty over whether the recipient who the benefits from these payments should receive a reduced withholding tax rate, which would be otherwise available under a tax treaty between the countries of the payer and recipient.

How far tax authorities can use the beneficial ownership test as an anti-avoidance tool to target the routing of payments through particular countries has also not been clear.

However, PwC tax partner Richard Collier-Keywood is not convinced the revisions achieve any clarification.

He said: “The OECD has provided some clarification on how payments being passed on affect beneficial ownership of income received, but not enough. For instance the new wording refers to ‘unrelated payments’ without any explanation of what it means for a payment to be related or unrelated.

“Beneficial ownership is a big issue for many international businesses which must comply with complex international and domestic tax rules. Given the current focus on corporate tax affairs, it is more important than ever that the rules affecting the level of tax paid are clear.”

Related Articles

Big names, little tax: Airbnb, Facebook, Kellogg’s, eBay

Corporate Tax Big names, little tax: Airbnb, Facebook, Kellogg’s, eBay

2w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
EU divided over radical tax reforms targeting tech giants

Corporate Tax EU divided over radical tax reforms targeting tech giants

3w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
How to educate your clients about tax avoidance

Corporate Tax How to educate your clients about tax avoidance

3w Clear Books | Sponsored
Autumn Statement: Investment and tax avoidance highlighted in Hammond's speech

Corporate Tax Autumn Statement: Investment and tax avoidance highlighted in Hammond's speech

11m Kevin Reed, Writer
Colin: Tell them about the money, mummy

Business Regulation Colin: Tell them about the money, mummy

11m Taking Stock
CGT clampdown nets HMRC £124m – but could lead to increase in use of avoidance schemes

Corporate Tax CGT clampdown nets HMRC £124m – but could lead to increase in use of avoidance schemes

4w Austin Clark, Reporter
‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

Corporate Tax ‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

1m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Global tax avoidance convention set to be signed by over 60 jurisdictions

Corporate Tax Global tax avoidance convention set to be signed by over 60 jurisdictions

5m Emma Smith, Managing Editor