THE PREPONDERANCE of Big Four alumni working as finance directors and audit committee chairmen in the FTSE 350 could be stifling competition in the audit market.
In papers published by the Competition Commission ahead of the preliminary findings of its investigation into the Big Four’s dominance of the audit market, the regulator said competition could be restricted by the “backgrounds of those involved in the appointment of auditors”.
According to the commission survey, 64% of all respondents (both FDs and audit committee chairmen) had previously worked for a Big Four firm. The watchdog also found that the majority of FTSE 350 companies would consider only Big Four firms, with 84% if FTSE 100 companies taking such an approach.
“We consider that this preference for Big Four firms might also reflect the backgrounds of those involved in the appointment of auditors,” the commission said. It is possible that this familiarity will make them more favourably disposed to the appointment of a Big Four rather than a non-Big Four firm (if their experience was positive) – on the other hand, it could make them less aware of the quality and experience of non-Big Four firms.”
The most frequently mentioned reason for choosing a Big Four auditor, by both FDs and audit commiteee chairmen, was the size and geographic coverage of the Big Four audit firms, sector knowledge and experience, the commission said.
An improved internal audit code is "vital' to developing the City's risk management, former shadow chancellor Ed Balls has said
Board members of accounting standard setter the IASB have come under fire for the size of their remuneration packages amid scrutiny of how the organisation is governed
Internal auditors are earn more than external consulting auditors, analysis by salary-bench marking site Emolument.com has found
ICAS and the FRC have called for action to prevent a potential audit skills gap in the future, with the launch of a new report