PracticeAuditMandatory audit tendering introduced in UK governance code

Mandatory audit tendering introduced in UK governance code

UK Corporate Governance Code introduces comply-or-explain for FTSE 350 companies that fail to put their audit out to tender at least every ten years

FTSE 350 COMPANIES will have to explain if they fail to put their audit out to tender at least every ten years.

Accounting watchdog the FRC has amended the UK’s governance code. FTSE 350 companies should put the external audit out to tender at least every ten years “with the aim of ensuring a high-quality and effective audit”.

More regular tendering should “help counter any misconception that long audit tenure reflects a lack of competition by showing that the quality of the audit is periodically subject to challenge”, said Richard Sexton, board member for reputation and policy, PwC.

“PwC has always maintained that the audit market is fiercely competitive and this new provision will create more opportunities to demonstrate that competitiveness on a regular basis.

“Tendering is fundamentally different to rotation, which we and many market participants remain strongly opposed to, as it does not automatically rule the incumbent out of the process, nor dilute the critical governance principle that allows companies and shareholders to appoint the best provider in their eyes.”

The FRC will talk to companies, auditors and investors about whether tendering guidance is needed.

The UK Corporate Governance Code will also include a requirement for audit committees to provide shareholders with information on how the committee has carried out its responsibilities, including the effectiveness of the external audit process.

Boards will also have to confirm the annual report and accounts taken as a whole are “fair, balanced and understandable”, and that the narrative sections of the report correlate with the financial statements.

Progress with boardroom diversity will also need to be outlined.

Those that choose not to follow any code provisions will have to provide fuller explanations to shareholders as to why they have chosen not to follow it.

More to follow.

Related Articles

The future of the audit industry: From masses of data, to meaning

Audit The future of the audit industry: From masses of data, to meaning

12m Acccountancy Age
Deloitte scoops GSK 'mega audit' from PwC

Audit Deloitte scoops GSK 'mega audit' from PwC

12m Kevin Reed, Writer
Friday Afternoon Live: HMRC complaints rise; Deloitte scoops big audits; and corporate reporting woes

Audit Friday Afternoon Live: HMRC complaints rise; Deloitte scoops big audits; and corporate reporting woes

1y Kevin Reed, Writer
BDO appointed new auditor of Game Digital as Deloitte ditched

Audit BDO appointed new auditor of Game Digital as Deloitte ditched

1y Stephanie Wix, Writer
BDO's 'agility' makes it well placed to succeed - Eagland

Accounting Firms BDO's 'agility' makes it well placed to succeed - Eagland

1y Kevin Reed, Writer
Friday Afternoon Live: Accountants in government; audit market concentration; Top 40 Networks

Audit Friday Afternoon Live: Accountants in government; audit market concentration; Top 40 Networks

1y Kevin Reed, Writer
The impact of Brexit on EU audit reform

Audit The impact of Brexit on EU audit reform

1y Richard Crump, Writer
Audit Reform: The Conflict Minefield

Audit Audit Reform: The Conflict Minefield

1y James Roberts, BDO