READERS ARE SPLIT over the basis on which reprimands should be meted out in Accounting and Actuarial Disciplinary Board (AADB) disciplinary proceedings.
Just over half of Accountancy Age readers polled – 52% – feel punishments should fit the crime in question, while a significant minority of 42% would prefer to see penalties based on who is in the dock, with larger, more powerful defendants apportioned greater responsibility.
The remaining 6% of the 47 respondents were unsure where they stand on the issue.
The AADB – the disciplinary arm of the FRC – was warned this month that changes to the way disciplinary sanctions are calculated could damage the profession and deter people from entering the industry and continuing membership with institutes.
It is currently considering increasing fines on larger member firms because current penalties do not incentivise the right behaviour and are failing to be a “credible” deterrent to misconduct.
Following KPMG’s announcement of staff cuts, do you expect other firms to follow suit?
Click here to take part in Accountancy Age‘s latest poll.
Improvements to cashflow statements are being targeted in a consultation launched by the Financial Reporting Council (FRC)
Accountancy Age's new survey reveals accountants' concerns about auto enrolment; and the latest on the growing accounting empire chaired by John Connolly
The Financial Reporting Council has issued guidance regarding the annual reporting of 1,200 large and smaller listed companies. The letter highlighted the key issues and improvements that can be made in the 2016 reporting season
The ACCA has today unveiled major innovations to its masters level qualification.