READERS ARE SPLIT over the basis on which reprimands should be meted out in Accounting and Actuarial Disciplinary Board (AADB) disciplinary proceedings.
Just over half of Accountancy Age readers polled – 52% – feel punishments should fit the crime in question, while a significant minority of 42% would prefer to see penalties based on who is in the dock, with larger, more powerful defendants apportioned greater responsibility.
The remaining 6% of the 47 respondents were unsure where they stand on the issue.
The AADB – the disciplinary arm of the FRC – was warned this month that changes to the way disciplinary sanctions are calculated could damage the profession and deter people from entering the industry and continuing membership with institutes.
It is currently considering increasing fines on larger member firms because current penalties do not incentivise the right behaviour and are failing to be a “credible” deterrent to misconduct.
Following KPMG’s announcement of staff cuts, do you expect other firms to follow suit?
Click here to take part in Accountancy Age‘s latest poll.
Board members of accounting standard setter the IASB have come under fire for the size of their remuneration packages amid scrutiny of how the organisation is governed
The government is considering whether it should propose changes to the legislation governing bonding arrangements for insolvency practitioners
How can advisers provide value-added services to clients profitably and securely? Bobby Lane, Carl Reader and Nick Dwan take Accountancy Age through the opportunities
THE accounting watchdog has launched disciplinary formal complaints against KPMG over its audit of a Lloyd’s of London syndicate Equity Red Star