FRC disciplinary cases to be settled without need for tribunals

FRC disciplinary cases to be settled without need for tribunals

FRC consults on proposals to allow disciplinary cases to be concluded without the need for a full tribunal hearing

THE ACCOUNTING WATCHDOG is to introduce a procedure that allows disciplinary cases to be concluded without the need for a full tribunal hearing as part of a series of changes to the way disciplinary schemes operate.

Under proposals issued by the Financial Reporting Council, cases under investigation by the regulator could, in some instances, be settled without the need for a public hearing before a disciplinary tribunal.

As part of the FRC consultation, the regulator intends to distance itself from the professional bodies that help fund it by removing the requirement to consult with them during the disciplinary process.

The FRC expects this will save time and costs in appropriate cases, as consultations with the professional bodies sometimes add as much as three months to the process of starting an investigation.

The institutes will also lose the right to veto future changes to the schemes, although in instances when one or more of the professional bodies continues to object to a proposed amendment to the disciplinary scheme, the disagreement will be referred to an independent adjudicator, such as a recently retired member of the Supreme Court or other recently retired, senior member of the judiciary.

Other proposals include giving the FRC the ability to conduct enquiries before launching an investigation, and giving it the power to impose interim orders. However, the FRC said that that interim orders would be reserved for the most exceptional circumstances.

Richard Fleck, conduct committee chairman, said the package put forwards by the FRC would create a more “streamlined disciplinary process”.

“We believe that these changes will benefit all parties and lead to swifter disciplinary outcomes while preserving the necessary level of transparency,” Fleck said.

Following the restructuring of the FRC with effect from 2 July 2012, responsibility for operating the disciplinary schemes will transfer from the Accountancy and Actuarial Discipline Board (AADB) to the FRC through the Conduct Committee, which will assume day-to-day responsibility for the oversight and maintenance of nthe disciplinary arrangements.

Responses to the consultation are requested by 15 September 2012.

Share

Subscribe to get your daily business insights

Resources & Whitepapers

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata
Professional Services

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata

3y

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folde...

In the past decade, the professional services industry has transformed significantly. Digital disruptions, increased competition, and changing market ...

View resource
2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

3y

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professi...

In recent months, professional services firms are facing more pressure than ever to deliver value to clients. Often, clients look at the firms own inf...

View resource
Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine
Accounting Firms

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

3y

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

In a world of instant results and automated workloads, the potential for AP to drive insights and transform results is enormous. But, if you’re still ...

View resource
Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021
Making Tax Digital

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

3y

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

The first phase of Making Tax Digital (MTD) saw the requirement for the digital submission of the VAT Return using compliant software. That’s now behi...

View resource