RegulationCorporate GovernanceTechnology promises to make green reports easier to navigate

Technology promises to make green reports easier to navigate

New XBRL tagging system to help investors and stakeholders better track firms' environmental performance

It is one of the most common complaints levelled at firm’s sustainability reports: they are difficult to navigate and hard to compare.

Now leading standards body the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) has launched a new taxonomy modelled on the tagging standards already used for financial reports that promises to make it much easier for investors and stakeholders to assess corporate sustainability reports, Accountancy Age’s sister publication BusinessGreen.com writes.

Unveiled last week, the new taxonomy has been developed in collaboration with Deloitte Netherlands and has been made freely available to sustainability professionals around the world.

It builds on the existing eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) that companies commonly use to tag data in financial reports, making it easier for interested parties to search and compare information with other businesses.

In April last year HM Revenue & Customs required that all companies must submit corporate tax returns in an online version of the tagging technology, iXBRL.

The GRI taxonomy extends the model to apply to common environmental and social data found in sustainability reports, such as carbon emissions, water use and human rights infringements.

“Today’s new taxonomy is a major step forward in making sustainability data available to society,” said Nelmara Arbex, deputy chief executive of the GRI in a statement.

“Many companies already use XBRL to tag their financial performance data; the GRI Taxonomy means that companies can tag their sustainability data, making it easily accessible for people who want to find information in the report.”

The news came in the same week as the GRI released the results of the first public comment period for the next iteration of its reporting guidelines, dubbed G4.

The consultation attracted more than 1,800 submissions, with the majority indicating they want to see GRI more clearly define topics and indicators that should be included in sustainability reports and provide more guidance on how to develop integrated financial and non-financial reports.

The exercise also resulted in calls for the GRI to introduce new guidance or update reporting guidance on business ethics, greenhouse gas emissions, eco-innovation, life cycle assessment, water and biodiversity.

 

Related Articles

Solvency and liquidity queries tackled in FRC going concern guidance

Accounting Standards Solvency and liquidity queries tackled in FRC going concern guidance

2y Calum Fuller, Reporter
Leader: Law firms should heed accountancy's listing mistakes

Accounting Firms Leader: Law firms should heed accountancy's listing mistakes

3y Kevin Reed, Writer
Watchdog issues review of audit governance code

Audit Watchdog issues review of audit governance code

3y Chris Warmoll, Writer
FRC consulting on going concern in changes to CG code

Corporate Governance FRC consulting on going concern in changes to CG code

4y Richard Crump, Writer
EU to raise environmental taxes across member states

Corporate Governance EU to raise environmental taxes across member states

4y Rachael Singh, Writer
FRC publishes final guidance on going concern

Business Regulation FRC publishes final guidance on going concern

3y Richard Crump, Writer
FRC reveals ‘struggle’ in IASB discussions

Accounting Standards FRC reveals ‘struggle’ in IASB discussions

3y Naomi Rainey, Writer
Extended audit and audit committee reports produce varied results

Audit Extended audit and audit committee reports produce varied results

3y Naomi Rainey, Writer