RECRUITMENT FIRM REED has lost a £158m tax case against HM Revenue & Customs over a so-called salary sacrifice scheme for its temps.
Reed provided £6 subsistence and up to £11.45 a day for its temps – effectively taken from their salaries and free of income tax and NI.
The strategy was applied to 500,000 temporary staff between 1998 and 2006, and HMRC is claiming for £158m of unpaid tax and NI between 2001 and 2006.
The tax tribunal heard Reed argue that HMRC had given clearance to the scheme. An internal HMRC email referred to during the hearing suggested that could have a viable claim that the taxman had cleared the scheme. “It looks to me like we have cocked-up here,” stated the email.
“We may think it necessary to consult lawyers but I think that Reed may well have a strong case under administrative law that they were entitled to rely on our representation (ruling) that the workers were employees under an overriding contract of employment,” the email continued.
Reed wants a judicial review over its treatment by the taxman, reported the Financial Mail.
The ATT had previously expressed concern that the legislation was overly complex and created unnecessary complications within the practical working of the new allowances
Introduced in 2013 to encourage R&D investment, the scheme allows UK businesses to pay only 10% corporation tax on profits derived from any UK or certain EU patents
Yet, KPMG’s annual survey shows that the UK is still an attractive place to do business, despite falling in rankings in tax competitiveness and FDI appeal
MTD cost estimates are not based on 'facts', and are 'disbelieved' by most small businesses and sole traders, says Lords committee chairman