RegulationAccounting StandardsInvestors: Improve disclosure and comparability

Investors: Improve disclosure and comparability

Investors call for higher quality, thoughtful disclosure and more consistent application of IFRS

INVESTORS took a the stand at the annual Meet the Experts conference with a list of “quick wins” – ways in which financial reporters can easily improve their performance in the eyes of those holding the purse strings.

Segmental performance, often used in bottom-up comparisons and valuation, would be easier to interpret if management were to disclosure information used in their assessments such as revenue and working capital, investors said.

They would like to see fewer exceptions and qualifications in cash flow reporting, including a summary of non-cash items such as pension contributions and finance leases.

Mergers and acquisitions, net debt reconciliation and pensions also received similar treatment, with investors calling for greater clarity and real efforts to make financial reports more “decision-useful”.

Better presentation would also make the documents more useful for investors and the quality of disclosure should always be kept in mind to “tell the story of the company”.

This means joining up the reporting where financial, operational and market risks join up, as well as consistently good disclosure, which avoids the temptation to lump items together with no or poor explanation.

On international financial reporting standards, investors warned they risk falling short on promised levels of consistency.

Variations such as jurisdictional interpretations and accounting choices are causing problems, as well as the principles-based right of preparer judgement being exploited to “get to the correct answer”.

The Greek debt crisis is a “classic example”, investors complained, pointing to different banks’ recognised losses – which ranged from 21% impairment in France to 51% in Germany – and national regulators’ differing responses.

They called for “much more detail in the accounting policy”, saying this would be “very helpful” and avoid boilerplate reporting in complex areas such as revenue recognition.

The alternative is a loss of confidence in financial statements and subsequent rising capital costs, accompanied by dwindling faith in IFRS and a negative impact on standard setters’ plans to converge the global standards with US GAAP, they warned.

Related Articles

Cashflow statement improvements targeted by watchdog

Accounting Standards Cashflow statement improvements targeted by watchdog

1y Stephanie Wix, Writer
Six ways Brexit will impact companies’ financial statements

Accounting Standards Six ways Brexit will impact companies’ financial statements

1y Richard Crump, Writer
FRC proposes changes to FRS 101

Accounting Standards FRC proposes changes to FRS 101

1y Richard Crump, Writer
ICAEW wants greater clarity over access to simplified accounting regime

Accounting Standards ICAEW wants greater clarity over access to simplified accounting regime

2y Calum Fuller, Reporter
Solvency and liquidity queries tackled in FRC going concern guidance

Accounting Standards Solvency and liquidity queries tackled in FRC going concern guidance

2y Calum Fuller, Reporter
Non-financial information must be as reliable as financial counterpart, ICAEW says

Accounting Standards Non-financial information must be as reliable as financial counterpart, ICAEW says

2y Calum Fuller, Reporter
Amendments to FRS 101 and FRS 103 proposed by FRC

Accounting Standards Amendments to FRS 101 and FRS 103 proposed by FRC

2y Chris Warmoll, Writer
Nearly half of financial institutions at risk of missing 2018 IFRS 9 deadline

Accounting Standards Nearly half of financial institutions at risk of missing 2018 IFRS 9 deadline

3y Chris Warmoll, Writer