TaxCorporate TaxM&S wins latest loss relief battle

M&S wins latest loss relief battle

Lord justices find in favour of high street chain in long-running loss relief saga

THE COURT OF APPEAL has upheld Marks & Spencer’s position in the long running dispute with HM Revenue & Customs over the use of losses in overseas jurisdictions.

The saga began in 2002 and centred on the business’s use of losses made in subsidiaries based in Belgium and Germany to offset its UK tax bill. The European Court of Justice ruled that this practice was acceptable, so long as the losses could not be used for relief in the subsidary’s resident country – the so-called “no possibilities” test.

The main area of contention is now over when the test should be applied – at the end of the accounting period where the losses applied, which is HMRC’s position, or the date of the claim. M&S contends that it would not be possible to apply the test at the end of the accounting period, because it would not be possible to forsee what reliefs would apply. The upper tax tribunal agreed with the taxpayer.

The latest ruling in the Court of Appeal upheld this position.

Peter Cussons, tax partner at PwC, said this was a “steady as she goes” ruling, and it is likely that this is not the end of the saga.

Stephen Herring, tax partner at BDO, said that these issues are clouding the main point, that M&S is entitled to use the loss relief.

“HMRC have attempted to, artificially, in my view, place obstacles in the way of M&S securing group relief in the circumstances which arose here by attempting to adopt an unduly restrictive view of the group relief claims,” he said

“I think HMRC should resist the temptation to appeal this judgement and focus upon pursuing cases where the EU rights are being abused to assist tax avoidance schemes,” Herring added.

Related Articles

Watch out when winding up

Corporate Tax Watch out when winding up

1m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
HMRC large business tax enquiry duration rises to 3 years

Corporate Tax HMRC large business tax enquiry duration rises to 3 years

4m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

Corporate Tax ‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

8m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
OTS report: Corporation tax should follow accounts

Corporate Tax OTS report: Corporation tax should follow accounts

10m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
HMRC tax evasion assistance requests double in five years

Corporate Tax HMRC tax evasion assistance requests double in five years

11m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Spring Budget 2017: Making Tax Digital

Business Regulation Spring Budget 2017: Making Tax Digital

1y Shereen Ali, Deputy Editor
Tax fraud loses HMRC £16bn

Corporate Tax Tax fraud loses HMRC £16bn

1y Emma Smith, Managing Editor
HMRC nets £2.6bn in corporate tax from big businesses

Corporate Tax HMRC nets £2.6bn in corporate tax from big businesses

1y Accountancy Age editorial