TAX REVENUE lost through the use of tax havens by Private Finance Initiative (PFI) investors means the scheme does not represent value for money, MPs have said today.
PFI schemes are public projects that are part-funded by the private sector. A report by the Commons’ Public Accounts Committee found that many shareholders of PFI investment funds are registered offshore. It quoted one fund that had 72% of its shareholders abroad.
However, the Treasury does not take this into account when reviewing the value for money of a scheme for the Exchequer, the MPs said. The government was unable to say whether PFI investors had paid tax in the UK on their profits and equity gains or whether corporation taxes had been collected from PFI companies. PFI “looks like a better deal for the private sector than for the taxpayer,” the report added.
PAC chair Margaret Hodge (pictured) said: “The Treasury assumes tax revenues when assessing the value for money of a PFI project, yet does not monitor whether taxes are paid. In our evidence, we found that tax revenue is being lost through the use of off-shore arrangements by PFI investors.
“The Treasury should measure the tax revenues from PFI deals and should ensure that this is taken into account in future assessments of PFI against conventional procurement.”
Introduced in 2013 to encourage R&D investment, the scheme allows UK businesses to pay only 10% corporation tax on profits derived from any UK or certain EU patents
Yet, KPMG’s annual survey shows that the UK is still an attractive place to do business, despite falling in rankings in tax competitiveness and FDI appeal
MTD cost estimates are not based on 'facts', and are 'disbelieved' by most small businesses and sole traders, says Lords committee chairman
MTD represents 'the single most significant change to the UK’s system of taxation in recent times', says Knill James partner Nick Rawson. So, how prepared are SMEs for digital tax reporting?