CIPFA: Off-balance sheet government borrowing must stop

CIPFA: Off-balance sheet government borrowing must stop

CIPFA says government must avoid shifting debts off balance sheet through PFI and prioritise value for money

CIPFA HAS CALLED on the government to stop shifting debt off balance sheet via private finance initiatives (PFI), used to fund major projects like new schools and hospitals.

A House of Commons Treasury Select Committee report today decided PFI “does not provide taxpayers with good value for money” and must not be used “to circumvent departmental budget limits”.

PFI was first mooted in the early 1990s, but rose to prominence under Labour from 1997. Projects are partially funded by private sector partners, with government money coming via banks or bond holders.

CIPFA said PFI assets and liabilities should be on the public sector balance sheet, in line with international financial reporting standards.

Draft whole of government accounts (WGA) using IFRS were recently produced for the first time and showed discrepancies from the old National Accounts, with higher levels of borrowing evident on the WGA.

Policy & technical director Ian Carruthers said: “CIPFA supports the committee’s recommendation to align the treatment of PFIs in departmental budgets with the treatment in financial accounts – this control-based approach better reflects the government’s true liabilities. Recognising the true liabilities will help create a level playing field where PFI becomes the preferred option only when it provides true value for money.”

The select committee warned poor investment decisions may continue to be encouraged by the ‘buy now, pay later’ appeal of PFI, which allows departments to commission capital-heavy projects without taking the financial hit.

It railed against “perverse incentives unrelated to value for money” and called on the Office of Budget Responsibility to include PFI liabilities in future assessments of the fiscal rules.

The body noted the average cost of a low-risk PFI project is more than 8% – double that of government gilts – and paying off a £1bn PFI debt could be equivalent to servicing a direct government debt of £1.7bn.

CIPFA said PFI should be “only one of a number of options”, and funding appraisals must be carried out “on a level playing field”, with value for money the main priority.

Share

Subscribe to get your daily business insights

Resources & Whitepapers

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata
Professional Services

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata

3y

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folde...

In the past decade, the professional services industry has transformed significantly. Digital disruptions, increased competition, and changing market ...

View resource
2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

3y

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professi...

In recent months, professional services firms are facing more pressure than ever to deliver value to clients. Often, clients look at the firms own inf...

View resource
Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine
Accounting Firms

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

3y

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

In a world of instant results and automated workloads, the potential for AP to drive insights and transform results is enormous. But, if you’re still ...

View resource
Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021
Making Tax Digital

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

3y

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

The first phase of Making Tax Digital (MTD) saw the requirement for the digital submission of the VAT Return using compliant software. That’s now behi...

View resource