A SUPREME COURT judgment on the employment status of contractors could affect the tax liabilities of one million workers and a large number of businesses, experts have claimed.
Car valeters who carried out work for Autoclenz took the company to the Supreme Court to claim they were employees. The company claimed that substitution clauses in the contract – which place an obligation on the individuals to provide services when they were unable to – proved that the individuals were not employees.
However, the court ruled that these clauses were not a true reflection on the workers’ employment status. The judges said that tribunals should take into account the expectation of the parties and the bargaining power between the parties to decide whether the workers had a choice in signing the contract. These factors could trump the written agreement, the court added.
This ruling means that “the foundations of employment status have been rocked to their very core”, MacIntyre Hudson claimed.
Alastair Kendrick, employment tax director at the firm, said that many businesses had used substitution clauses to protect themselves from paying PAYE and HM Revenue & Customs has had trouble proving that individuals are, indeed, employees.
“We are talking about one million workers being affected,” Kendrick added. Many of these individuals will be in the construction industry, he said.
“This raises issues for the employer,” Kendrick added. “Many will be now be paying PAYE rather than Schedule D tax. They can expect a knock on the door from the taxman for retrospective taxes – this can go back as far as six years.”
Making Tax Digital will impose significant additional tax compliance costs on small businesses for little or no medium term benefit, tax and small business experts told MPs
MHA MacIntyre Hudson has partnered with cloud accounting software provider Xero ahead of the government’s requirement for digital records
The drive towards a fully digital tax regime is an admirable one, but mandation is simply wrong, according to one of the UK's most senior tax technology practitioners - Paul Aplin
Does Darwin's theory apply to taxation? Colin ponders...