TaxCorporate TaxHMRC must back up collaboration claim, say advisors

HMRC must back up collaboration claim, say advisors

The revised settlement and litigation strategy promises to prioritise avoiding dispute

THE TAXMAN’S emphasis on collaboration in settling tax disputes must be carried out in practice, advisors have said.

HM Revenue & Customs issued its revised settlement and litigation strategy today. It promises to “handle disputes non-confrontationally and by working collaboratively with the customer whenever possible”. This will not deter HMRC from pursuing litigation or other approaches if collaboration is not working.

Dave Hartnett (pictured), permanent secretary for tax, said that HMRC will not involve itself in “package deals”, trading unrelated points against one another, or reach a settlement less than the tax and penalties due in cases that are “all or nothing”. However, the Taxman will consider whether or not there is a possible range of figures for tax due in cases that originally appear to be all or nothing.

Avoiding dispute must be the priority of both HMRC and the taxpayer, Hartnett added. However, where there are wider implications, such as setting a precedent, this will take priority.

Gary Ashford, head of tax investigations at RSM Tenon, said that HMRC must “appreciate that collaboration is a two-way process”.

“HMRC is emphasising that it will not do 50-50 deals,” he added. “But there is scope in life to meet somewhere in the middle. I can understand why it does not want to end up in the 50-50 situation but it can be a pragmatic approach.

“The proof is in the pudding. If HMRC starts an inquiry, from the initial contact it must be an open and collaborative approach. This strategy can be used for that.”

Chris Oates, head of Ernst & Young’s tax dispute and resolution team said the announcement “marks an important step towards clearing HMRC’s backlog of over 2,700 historical tax disputes with the UK’s largest PLCs, some of which have been ongoing for over 10 years”.

“In recent years, litigation appeared to have become HMRC’s default approach to resolving significant tax disputes – particularly where tax avoidance might have been a motive – resulting in a queue of cases waiting to go through the courts,” he added.

“The updated strategy heralds a more pragmatic approach through greater dialogue, negotiation, and potentially mediation. It should also help bring some much needed cash into Treasury coffers.”

Related Articles

Watch out when winding up

Corporate Tax Watch out when winding up

1m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
HMRC large business tax enquiry duration rises to 3 years

Corporate Tax HMRC large business tax enquiry duration rises to 3 years

4m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

Corporate Tax ‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

8m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
OTS report: Corporation tax should follow accounts

Corporate Tax OTS report: Corporation tax should follow accounts

10m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
HMRC tax evasion assistance requests double in five years

Corporate Tax HMRC tax evasion assistance requests double in five years

11m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Spring Budget 2017: Making Tax Digital

Business Regulation Spring Budget 2017: Making Tax Digital

1y Shereen Ali, Deputy Editor
Tax fraud loses HMRC £16bn

Corporate Tax Tax fraud loses HMRC £16bn

1y Emma Smith, Managing Editor
HMRC nets £2.6bn in corporate tax from big businesses

Corporate Tax HMRC nets £2.6bn in corporate tax from big businesses

1y Accountancy Age editorial