TaxCorporate TaxPatent box “formula” needs tweaking, advisors warn

Patent box "formula" needs tweaking, advisors warn

Proposals to calculate how much profit a company made from a patent to qualify for a reduced corporation tax must be reformed before the initiative goes live, advisors have warned.

PROPOSALS to calculate how much profit a company made from a patent to qualify for a reduced corporation tax must be reformed before the initiative goes live, advisors have warned.

The government’s “patent box” consultation proposes a reduced rate of 10% corporation tax on products that have been patented, such as pharmaceuticals, in a move to encourage innovation.

Tax professionals have welcomed the initiative. However, there are concerns around the formula to calculate how much of the company’s profits are eligible for the 10% rate.

Sally Grimwood, a director in Deloitte’s tax faculty, said the proposals are going in the right direction. “This is looking pretty good in the main. It is very sensible and a great example of where government has listened to what people think. With this one, we were given a blank sheet of paper in November 2010,” she said.

But the formula for working out the profits that are eligible for the rate must be tweaked, she added. Under the government’s formula, companies must work out how much of their overall turnover related to the patented product. It must then deduct 15% of this figure as “routine profit” that companies would normally charge for labour, overheads and the like.

However, 15% is too high a figure, said Grimwood. The actual figure is closer to 5%-7%, she said, and imposing 15% would reduce the incentive to innovate.

Jonathan Bridges, an associate partner at KPMG, said the consultation was good news for UK businesses. But he said other forms of intellectual property should be rewarded.

“The government is recognising intellectual property generally. But it is only rewarding certain forms of IP. I would challenge whether this is to limit the cost.”

Software groups cannot patent their good ideas in the UK unlike in other jurisdictions and so will be restricted, he said.

Related Articles

Watch out when winding up

Corporate Tax Watch out when winding up

2m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
HMRC large business tax enquiry duration rises to 3 years

Corporate Tax HMRC large business tax enquiry duration rises to 3 years

4m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

Corporate Tax ‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

8m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
OTS report: Corporation tax should follow accounts

Corporate Tax OTS report: Corporation tax should follow accounts

10m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
HMRC tax evasion assistance requests double in five years

Corporate Tax HMRC tax evasion assistance requests double in five years

11m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Q&A with the Financial Secretary to the Treasury

Corporate Tax Q&A with the Financial Secretary to the Treasury

11m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Spring Budget 2017: Making Tax Digital

Business Regulation Spring Budget 2017: Making Tax Digital

1y Shereen Ali, Deputy Editor
Tax fraud loses HMRC £16bn

Corporate Tax Tax fraud loses HMRC £16bn

1y Emma Smith, Managing Editor