ICAS CALLS ON GOVERNMENT to change insolvency laws to give greater protection to some unsecured creditors.
The Scottish institute suggested the government introduce legislation to protect consumers who have paid a deposit or purchased vouchers when a retailer collapses.
In the last year a consumers lost out when high profile companies such as Zavvi, Land of Leather, MFI and Farepak Foods entered administration, as vouchers and deposits are no longer redeemable.
ICAS is requesting new rules to force retailers to hold deposits and vouchers in a separate bank account that is not available to offset borrowing and ring-fenced for these creditors.
The recommendation is included in ICAS’s response to a recently closed Insolvency Service consultation on recommended changes to the profession’s regulation and legislation.
Ann Condick, (pictured) director of insolvency at ICAS, said: “This would be a bold move by government and it would need to consider how the requirement would work for smaller businesses who may not find it easy to operate a separate bank account.
“However, it is legislation that, with careful consideration, would be extremely beneficial for consumers and other unsecured creditors. We have witnessed a rise in high profile retail insolvencies over the last few years with some consumers losing out over the Christmas period which can be a difficult time for businesses and members of the public alike.
“Legislation of this nature would go some way to ensuring better returns for as many unsecured creditors as possible.”
Three former Tesco executives, including the former finance director of Tesco UK, have denied charges of fraud and false accounting in relation to a £326m accounting scandal at the supermarket
Steve Absolom and Will Wright from KPMG Restructuring have been appointed joint administrators to City Motor Holdings and associated companies
Partners from Johnston Carmichael have been appointed as joint administrators to Axon Well Interventions Products UK
For uncontested probate cases, clients should be turning to their accountants and not their lawyers and cutting out the middle man. But why are accountants better equipped than lawyers to assist?