PracticeAccounting FirmsAuditors reject lack of scepticism concerns

Auditors reject lack of scepticism concerns

Firms hit back at suggestions that more scepticism is needed in their work

AUDITORS have rejected the suggestion that their work requires more scepticism.

Following the release of a discussion paper from regulators on whether auditor scepticism needs to be increased, firms defended their attitude and working processes to provide audits.

Some noted that the application of international financial reporting standards (IFRS), which can provide a range of potential outcomes, is confused by regulators as a lack of scepticism.

Baker Tilly said that the paper suggests a “presumptive doubt”, which is beyond the new clarified auditing standards and therefore “wholly inappropriate”.

“In our opinion, if auditors were expected to plan their audits on the basis on the basis of ‘presumptive doubt’ this would greatly increase the work needed to issue an opinon because auditors have to plan their audits assuming that all the evidence they have been provided with at best was wrong or at worst was a lie,” said Baker Tilly technical director Hugh Morgan.

Deloitte said in its letter:” This change would significantly increase business costs and runs contrary to a risk-based approach.”

Firms also noted that illustrating sufficient skepticism when cold files were reviewed was very difficult.

Ernst & Young said: “Scepticism is more of a behavioural trait, and given this inherent quality it is difficult to demonstrate fully via documentation or indeed to measure objectively…It is an inseparable component of audit quality and we believe it is audit quality that must be appraised, promoted and rewarded, rather than its constituent parts.”

Richard Fleck, chairman of the APB, and a director of the FRC, said: “The APB intends to undertake further work in this area to ensure there is a consistent understanding of its nature and role, increased transparency of its application and appropriate consideration of the financial statement presentation of matters subject to significant challenge by auditors.”

More to follow.

Related Articles

FRC closes investigation into PwC over Barclays compliance

Accounting Firms FRC closes investigation into PwC over Barclays compliance

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
FRC closes KPMG HBOS audit investigation, Treasury Committee expects ‘full explanation’

Accounting Firms FRC closes KPMG HBOS audit investigation, Treasury Committee expects ‘full explanation’

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
BDO overtakes KPMG to take top spot in AIM auditor rankings

Accounting Firms BDO overtakes KPMG to take top spot in AIM auditor rankings

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
FRC launches investigation into PwC over BT audits

Accounting Firms FRC launches investigation into PwC over BT audits

6m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Which top firms need to improve audit practice?

Accounting Firms Which top firms need to improve audit practice?

6m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
FRC closes investigation into PwC over Tesco accounts

Accounting Firms FRC closes investigation into PwC over Tesco accounts

6m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Watchdog launches audit investigation into Sports Direct

Accounting Firms Watchdog launches audit investigation into Sports Direct

1y Stephanie Wix, Writer
FRC launches complaint against KPMG over audit of Lloyd’s syndicate Equity Red Star

Accounting Firms FRC launches complaint against KPMG over audit of Lloyd’s syndicate Equity Red Star

1y Richard Crump, Writer