FINANCIAL SOFTWARE COMPANY SAP saw it profits after tax fall, after losing a legal battle with rival Oracle.
The company’s fourth quarter figures showed that profits after tax fell 36% to €437m (£377m) for Q4 2010 compared with €682m for Q4 2009. However, it managed to increase profit after tax by 4% for 2010 as a whole, up to €1.82bn from €1.75bn.
SAP had to beef up provisions for a court battle against rival Oracle following the purchase of its TomorrowNow division. It was forced to pay damages. The company claims profit was also affected by restructuring costs of €5m in the fourth quarter.
However, SAP’s board will recommend to the supervisory board to increase dividend payments on shares by 20% to €0.60 from €0.50.
Software revenue increased 35% to €1.5bn for the fourth quarter of 2010
Under IFRS reporting, software revenue increased 35% to €1.51bn at the end of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 of €1.12bn.
“We finished 2010 with the highest fourth quarter for software revenue in our history. Our strong performance and our business outlook for 2011 demonstrate that SAP is confident about achieving double-digit growth and continued margin expansion,” said Werner Brandt, CFO of SAP.
A statement from SAP said it believes the amount awarded to Oracle in the litigation is “disproportionate and wrong”.
The German IT giant hopes to file post-trial motions to reduce the amount of damages awarded to Oracle, or request a new trial. Because of this, SAP is unable to provide an exact provision amount.
The company set aside €56m for the litigation in 2009, which ended up costing €980m by the end of the trail in 2010.
A new head of solutions, Aidan Brennan, has been appointed at KPMG UK
The Practitioner discusses their timesheet militancy, and reaction to someone playing it fast and loose with the details...
Making Tax Digital will impose significant additional tax compliance costs on small businesses for little or no medium term benefit, tax and small business experts told MPs
The drive towards a fully digital tax regime is an admirable one, but mandation is simply wrong, according to one of the UK's most senior tax technology practitioners - Paul Aplin