TaxCorporate TaxCBI describes anti-avoidance rule as “unwelcome”

CBI describes anti-avoidance rule as "unwelcome"

David Gauke's announcement of a general anti-avoidance rule will add uncertainty to the tax system, warns CBI

CBI describes anti-avoidance rule as “unwelcome”

THE CBI HAS LAUNCHED an attack on Government plans for a general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR) in UK tax law – the most significant element in a major attack on corporate and individual avoidance.

Will Morris, head of the CBI tax committee, said it acknowledges the nature of the coalition commitment to consider introducing GAAR and offered whatever help it can to the study team being set up by the Treasury, but disagreed with its purpose.

Morris said: “We believe that this would not be in the interest of the government, taxpayers, or UK competitiveness.

“It would introduce a very unwelcome element of uncertainty to the tax system.”

The study was announced with a package of five measures announced in the Commons by Exchequer secretary David Gauke (pictured).

It is part of a coalition commitment agreed between the Liberal Democrats and the Tories and the timing of his written statement to Parliament is seen as a deliberate step to shore up the coalition with the Lib Dems facing a major split in a Commons vote on raising the ceiling on student fees to £9,000.

A Treasury statement said the package “will protect forecast revenues estimated at up to £5bn over the next four years, and are expected to raise over £2bn in additional revenue during the course of this Parliament”.

Two measures with immediate effect will: prevent groups of companies using intra-group loans or derivatives, to reduce the group’s tax bill, and, address schemes where a company does not fully recognise certain amounts in its accounts involving loans and derivatives.

Three more, to be detailed shortly, will: address the practice of disguised remuneration, stop investment companies retrospectively changing the currency they prepare their accounts in for tax purposes, and, tackle businesses that artificially split the supply of services to reduce VAT.

Gauke said he had appointed Graham Aaronson QC, one of the most experienced and respected tax silks of Pump Court Chambers, to lead a study “to establish whether a GAAR could be framed to meet the objectives of deterring and countering tax avoidance in a fair way, while providing certainty, retaining a tax regime that is attractive to business and minimise compliance costs for businesses and HMRC” and, if so, how it might be framed.

Membership of Aaronson’s team would be announced in January with a deadline of 31 October 2011, with its conclusions informing the Budget in 2012, Gauke added.

Related Articles

‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

Corporate Tax ‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

1w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
OTS report: Corporation tax should follow accounts

Corporate Tax OTS report: Corporation tax should follow accounts

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
HMRC tax evasion assistance requests double in five years

Corporate Tax HMRC tax evasion assistance requests double in five years

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
HMRC nets £2.6bn in corporate tax from big businesses

Corporate Tax HMRC nets £2.6bn in corporate tax from big businesses

8m Accountancy Age editorial
Tax crackdown brings in £468m for HMRC

Corporate Tax Tax crackdown brings in £468m for HMRC

8m Accountancy Age editorial
Q&A with the Financial Secretary to the Treasury

Corporate Tax Q&A with the Financial Secretary to the Treasury

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Spring Budget 2017: Making Tax Digital

Business Regulation Spring Budget 2017: Making Tax Digital

7m Shereen Ali, Deputy Editor
Tax fraud loses HMRC £16bn

Corporate Tax Tax fraud loses HMRC £16bn

7m Emma Smith, Managing Editor