PracticeAuditEU budget errors despite auditor sign-off

EU budget errors despite auditor sign-off

Material errors in EU agricultural payments, find auditors, despite being classed as true and fair

PAYMENTS FROM the European Union’s (EU) budget continue to be “materially affected by error”, according to its auditors, despite the union’s accounts being classed as a fair representation of its financial position.

The European Court of Auditors found improvements in the likely error for the budget as a whole for 2009. However, payments from the budget continue to be materially affected by error in all but two areas of expenditure – economic and financial affairs and administrative expenditure.

“Improving the quality of spending should be a high priority. Simplifying legislative frameworks and introducing more cost-effective systems to reduce the risk of error should contribute to this goal”, said Vitor Caldeira, president of the European Court of Auditors.

Algirdas Šemeta, commissioner for taxation, customs, anti-fraud and audit, at the EU, said: “We can be pleased with the improvements in EU financial management, which are recognised today by the Court of Auditors. But there is always more that can be done, and the Commission will continue its intense efforts to ensure that EU funds are properly accounted for and well spent.”

The EU spent €118bn (£102bn) in 2009.

Around €55bn were spent on agriculture programmes under the Common Agricultural Policy. Auditors found that 27% of sample transactions were affected by error.

Although the EU described the findings as its third clean bill of health in a row, others were less impressed by the findings.

Open Europe, a UK think tank comprising senior UK business heads such as Lord Sainsbury and M&S executive chairman Sir Stuart Rose, described the figures as “a hugely embarrassing annual tradition”.

“The sheer size and complexity of the EU budget means that it remains vulnerable to waste and mismanagement. Until member states and the European Commission resolve the inherent flaws in the EU’s spending there should be no talk whatsoever of budget increases,” said Open Europe analyst Stephen Booth.

 

Related Articles

Government outlines FRC status as competent authority for audit regulation

Audit Government outlines FRC status as competent authority for audit regulation

1y Richard Crump, Writer
The impact of Brexit on EU audit reform

Audit The impact of Brexit on EU audit reform

1y Richard Crump, Writer
Audit Reform: The Conflict Minefield

Audit Audit Reform: The Conflict Minefield

1y James Roberts, BDO
Low cost accounting firms to be the next victim of Brexit?

Accounting Firms Low cost accounting firms to be the next victim of Brexit?

1y Editorial comment
Leader: Audit competition drives change, not necessarily quality

Accounting Firms Leader: Audit competition drives change, not necessarily quality

1y Kevin Reed, Writer
FRC: No level playing field for disciplining directors in audit cases

Audit FRC: No level playing field for disciplining directors in audit cases

2y Calum Fuller, Reporter
Implementation of non-financial reporting should build on existing UK regime, says ICAEW

Audit Implementation of non-financial reporting should build on existing UK regime, says ICAEW

2y Calum Fuller, Reporter
UK's smallest companies liberated from FRSSE shackles

Accounting Firms UK's smallest companies liberated from FRSSE shackles

2y Chris Warmoll, Writer