BusinessBusiness RecoveryCostly new rules will put a drag on pre-packs

Costly new rules will put a drag on pre-packs

Plans to change the rules surrounding pre-packaged administrations by the government could drive up costs and undermine the process, IPs haved warned

Government proposals to reform pre-packaged administrations could sabotage
the procedure, according to insolvency professionals who warn it will drive up
costs.

Business minister Ian Lucas last month announced reforms to pre-packs aimed
at boosting confidence in the administration process, including proposals to
prevent an insolvency practitioner from advising on a pre-pack and then going on
to become the administrator.

Most insolvency practitioners recommend pre-packaged administrations because
they are quick and often offer creditors the best chance of recovering their
money. The proposals undermine both these aspects, insolvency practitioners
warn.

They fear the plans would incur higher costs and slow down the process. A
struggling company would have to pay two insolvency practitioners for the same
work, they claim.

A company in financial difficulty hires a insolvency practitioner to advise
on the best course of action. If a pre-pack is chosen, the IP will review the
business and seek the best sale price for the company.

The formal process for most pre-packs will often last a few hours when the
sale is conducted. Under the proposals, a second IP would be brought in at this
point. They will need to do another company review, slowing the process. They
may also handle the sale differently, causing further expense and delay.

“The proposed changes would add to costs, unquestionably,” said Ian McDonald,
head of restructuring at international law firm Mayer Brown. “In some cases that
may make a pre-pack unviable, particularly where there is a wider scepticism
about them in the first place.”

He said while there may be some benefits to the proposals, “the additional
cost will erode any additional benefit”.

Richard Heis, restructuring partner at KPMG, echoed the concerns and believes
the proposal could “significantly increase the cost of the administration”.

One insolvency partner said pre-packs would become “impractical” and is
unable to see “any benefits”.

Jonathan Porteous, an insolvency partner at Stevens & Bolton, claims the
changes could double the workload and fees and, in the end, the creditors may
not be better protected.

An insolvency committee will spearhead the consultation which is due to end
later this year.

Further reading:

Pre-packs need reform, but
not too much

Related Articles

CVR Global sells DMG Steelworkers out of administration in pre-pack deal

Accounting Firms CVR Global sells DMG Steelworkers out of administration in pre-pack deal

1y Richard Crump, Writer
Unpacking the Pre-Pack Pool

Business Recovery Unpacking the Pre-Pack Pool

1y Chris Warmoll, Writer
R3 calls for creditor 'breathing space' to help turn companies around

Accounting Standards R3 calls for creditor 'breathing space' to help turn companies around

2y Chris Warmoll, Writer
Devon firm saved from administration in connected party pre-pack deal

Accounting Firms Devon firm saved from administration in connected party pre-pack deal

2y Fraser Simpson, Reporter
The Pre Pack Pool: problem-prone, time-consuming, costly and pointless

Business Recovery The Pre Pack Pool: problem-prone, time-consuming, costly and pointless

2y Accountancy Age, Reporters
R3 cautiously welcomes advent of simpler bankruptcy regime

Business Recovery R3 cautiously welcomes advent of simpler bankruptcy regime

2y Chris Warmoll, Writer
Ben Sherman in pre-pack deal

Business Recovery Ben Sherman in pre-pack deal

2y Chris Warmoll, Writer
Taking Stock: Spotting accounting flaws is child’s play

Audit Taking Stock: Spotting accounting flaws is child’s play

2y Taking Stock