When it comes to taxing overseas athletes on their income, the world of sport
isn’t a level playing field.
HMRC has the ability to choose the sporting events or individuals that can
benefit from exemptions to UK tax, but this inequality is under the spotlight as
advisers have begun negotiations with the government on the issue.
Advisers want all foreign sport stars’ overseas earnings to be protected from
RSM Tenon is representing a number of individuals in negotiations with the
Department of Culture Media and Sport, Accountancy Age has learned.
“The aim of discussions is to get an exemption for non-UK source endorsement
income,” said RSM Tenon tax director Pete Hackleton.
But what is the value in such a move for the taxman and what would be
demanded in return?
The compromise for HMRC would be that the tax revenues generated from having
major sporting events based here would make up for any supposed loss to the
Exchequer caused by dropping claims to overseas income.
“The rationale is that if this doesn’t happen, the UK will struggle to
attract major events in future – the tax take from which (VAT on ticket sales
etc) should more than cover any perceived shortfall due to the exemption.
Hopefully, there will be some movement on this,” Hackleton added.
The negotiations come after the taxman was criticised after some of the
biggest names in sport, including sprint star Usain Bolt and top golfer Tiger
Woods, threatened to steer clear of the UK.
In the case of Bolt, he would have had to pay 50% tax on not only his UK
income but a slice of his worldwide earnings would have been taken as well.
Under the UK tax system, non-resident sportspeople are subject to the basic
rate of UK income tax on earnings due to their “performance” in the UK.
The taxman uses a test case victory against tennis star Andre Agassi as the
legal precedent to deny exemptions, but in the run-up to major sporting events
such as the 2012 Olympics it becomes even more important to know what falls in
and out of the taxman’s net.
Earlier this month Hartley Foster, tax disputes partner at law firm Olswang,
called the situation “absurd”.
The US operates on a similar model but the one key difference is that the
level of income tax demanded is far lower than the 50% required in the UK.
Double tax treaties between the UK and other countries usually exempt
individuals from taxation if they are in the UK for only a short time.
However, under special rules for “foreign entertainers and sportspeople”
overseas athletes can still be subject to UK taxation.
The UK and other countries have difficulty collecting money from players
because tax organisations with different policies have to operate alongside each
other. What counts as their “earnings” represents another grey area in itself.
The length of a given player’s “season” is a big discussion point in
calculating tax bills. For example, if a player earns £5m per season but the
season is only six months.
If the player competes for a week in the UK, it is open to interpretation
whether 1/52 or 1/26 of the pay packet should face UK tax.
After-dinner engagements, TV appearances and sponsorship generated after UK
appearances must all be considered by the taxman.
A senior source at HMRC said the UK was “not the only country which goes
after sports stars’ worldwide income”, so efforts to win the exemption for all
may not be easy.
Crowe Clark Whitehill , the top 20 accountancy firm, has announced the promotion of Chris Mould to partner
The latest opinions from Accountancy Age on Making Tax Digital, and outline plans to evolve the UK's corporate governance regime
Five million taxpayers are ow using digital personal tax accounts (PTA) as part of the making tax digital strategy, HMRC said
UK-based non-doms have paid ten times more tax than the average taxpayer, raising concerns over the Brexit impact on non-dom contributions and therefore, the economy