Two FTSE 100 audits required “significant improvement”, according to an
annual review of the UK’s largest eight audit firms, released today.
Auditors have also been accused of altering documents before handing them to
regulators and putting cost savings ahead of quality, in the review by the Audit
Inspection Unit (AIU).
The report raised a number of concerns following its inspection of 109 audits
from AIM and the FTSE 350.
The report also found some cases where partners signed audit reports before
the audit was complete and one instance when an auditor tried to alter an
internal file after the AIU requested it. Auditors had also changed internal
materiality thresholds, which effectively reduced their workload, and had also
not applied enough scepticism to internal asset valuations.
“In particular, in certain cases, it was unclear from the audit files whether
the audit teams had obtained an adequate understanding of the basis upon which
the prices used had been determined,” the report stated.
The release follows a joint Financial Services Authority/ FRC report,
released this month, which found auditors displayed a “worrying lack of
scepticism” when auditing banks valuation models.
The AIU report also reported that auditors were sending work to company-owned
offshore service centres to reduce costs – a practice it believes, sent the
wrong message to partners.
Paul George, director of the Professional Oversight Board which carried out
the inspections, said auditors needed to change their behaviour, and show more
scepticism when inspecting management judgments.
“We continue to find a rump of audits which don’t meet the standards we
expect. To eliminate this will require not just changes to policies and
procedures but also behavioural changes to ensure there is sufficient challenge
to management,” he said.
“Developments in auditing have not kept pace with developments in financial
reporting,” George added.
Liz Murrall, director of corporate reporting at the Investment Management
Association (IMA), said investors are worried about audit quality, when auditors
themselves are under commercial stress.
“In particular, investors are concerned in the current economic climate that
fee pressure on audit firms could impact audit quality,” she said.
PwC’s head of audit, Richard Sexton, said audit quality was the “foundation”
of the firm’s practice, while also conceding the need for reform. “The integrity
of our people and their behaviours are also vital components of a quality audit…
Process alone will never be the answer,” he said.
Oliver Tant, UK head of audit at KPMG, said he is “acutely aware” of the need
for auditors to be sceptical. “We are not complacent, however, and look forward
to a wider debate across the profession on the issue,” he said.
The AIU will release reports on individual audit firms in September.
PwC has been hit with a £2.3m fine by the accountancy watchdog over its audits of the financial statements of Cattles and Welcome Financial Services Limited
KPMG has retained its position as the listed company auditor, according to the latest Adviser Rankings.
We discuss the Accountancy Age Top 50+50 supported by Sage; growth at Menzies; and the provision of value-added services
While everyone values audit quality highly we must be be careful that we don’t let it deter talent. We need to guard against its commoditisation and the threat to a unitary profession