RegulationAccounting StandardsVolcker voices concerns about US fair-value proposal

Volcker voices concerns about US fair-value proposal

“My impression is the international people are pretty much going in the right directio" Volcker tells Forbes

US President Barack Obama’s chief economic adviser Paul Volcker has expressed
fears the American fair-value proposal may be heading in the wrong direction,
in
an interview with Forbes.com last month.

The ageing former chairman of the US Federal Reserve, who now heads up the
President’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board, is concerned the US accounting
standard setter’s fair-value, or mark-to-market, rules, which are being reformed
in the wake of the credit crisis, may be inferior to the international model.

“Well, I’m lost in some of the details, but my impression is just that (US
Financial Accounting Standards Board) is much more toward insisting upon
mark-to-market accounting in areas that I don’t think it’s appropriate,” Volcker
told Forbes.

“My impression is the international people are pretty much going in the right
direction. Your balance between that part of the financial books, that part of
the commercial banking book that should not be automatically mark-to-market,
distinct from parts that should be, where if you’ve got a trading book, should
be mark-to-market.”

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is exhibiting a full
fair-value model which, if adopted, would force banks to value their loan books
at their estimated market price.

The global standard setter, the International Accounting Standards Board
(IASB), has adopted a mixed-measurement model which allows banks to measure
loans at either fair value or cost, depending on whether loans are being traded
or held to maturity.

The fair-value model ravaged banks balance sheets in the crisis, as asset
prices plummeted in falling markets. Banks were forced to measure their
loan-books at depressed market prices which obliterated much of their
balance-sheet value.

The IASB and FASB hope to harmonise much of their two accounting codes by
June 2011. The fair-value rule is proving a stumbling block, with each board
adopting a different view on how to incorporate fair value.

Banks have railed against the FASB proposal which they feel will add
unnecessary volatility to their balance sheet. The all-powerful American Banking
Association has proven a particularly vocal critic of the standard which is
currently out on exhibition.

Further Reading:

Transcript:
Paul Volcker

FASB
in midst of “religious war” on fair value

Related Articles

FASB to modify fair value election option

Accounting Standards FASB to modify fair value election option

5y Rick Martin
ICAEW warns against prohibiting the use of fair value

Accounting Standards ICAEW warns against prohibiting the use of fair value

6y Richard Crump, Writer
FSA: Fair value accounting contributed to RBS failure

Accounting Standards FSA: Fair value accounting contributed to RBS failure

6y Rose Orlik
Fair value in focus for new accounting standard

Accounting Standards Fair value in focus for new accounting standard

7y Rose Orlik
Seidman takes up FASB chairman role

Accounting Standards Seidman takes up FASB chairman role

7y Kevin Reed, Writer
RBS chief says accounting obscures improved performance

Accounting Standards RBS chief says accounting obscures improved performance

7y Kevin Reed, Writer
Hoogervorst hopeful of US accounting convergence

Accounting Standards Hoogervorst hopeful of US accounting convergence

7y Paul Grant, Writer
World Bank backs US fair value proposal

Accounting Standards World Bank backs US fair value proposal

7y Mario Christodoulou, Writer