Academics have warned IMF recommendations to establish a bailout pot by
taxing banks may backfire.
Tax experts from the Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation said
financial institutions were more likely to take bigger risks if there was a
financial safety net in place.
In addition to a tax on profits and remuneration, banks would also pay a
Financial Stability Contribution, a flat fee on their non-insured liabilities if
IMF recommendations are pushed through.
“The IMF sees [the FSC] as a form of insurance premium, with the premium
(that is, the tax) paid being available to governments to create a fund for
future financial sector bailouts,” the academics said in a briefing note.
“If bank managers, owners, or creditors believe that they are insured against
future failure due to excessive risk-taking, then they are more likely to
undertake riskier behaviour. That would exacerbate the likelihood of a future
HMRC has won its tenth successive case against tax avoidance schemes promoted by NT Advisors. The Court of Appeal has ruled that NT ... read more
HMRC is continuing to ramp up the number of raids on premises it carries out as part of criminal investigations, searching 761 properties in the last year
Five million taxpayers are ow using digital personal tax accounts (PTA) as part of the making tax digital strategy, HMRC said
Since the release of HMRC’s plans for digital tax reforms, many have agreed with the call for a delay