New allegations of accounting trickery by collapsed US bank Lehman Brothers
have emerged after the
York Times newspaper claimed the firm used a front company to conceal
billions of dollars in toxic assets.
The newspaper claims company Hudson Castle played a behind-the-scenes role in
helping Lehman manipulate its finances.
newspaper claims the business was staffed by ex-Lehman employees and was
effectively controlled by Lehmans.
While the use of company arrangements are not uncommon, the paper said
shareholders were entitled to more transparency about the relationship.
The newspaper quotes a spokesman, on behalf of Hudson, which still operates,
who said the relationship with Lehman all but ended in 2004. “All funding
decisions at Hudson Castle were solely made by the management team and neither
the board of directors nor Lehman Brothers participated in or influenced those
decisions in any way”.
Read the full story:
Channeled Risks Through ‘Alter Ego’ Firm
administrators consider damning report
Steve Butler of Punter Southall Aspire highlights the importance of pension governance meetings to protect against mistakes and safeguard company reputation
Simon Wright of CareersinAudit.com discusses how an effective cyber defence force is critical to businesses worldwide and how internal auditors can make the transition to a new career in cyber security
The FRC has said that the investigation will 'consider, but not be restricted to, issues regarding misstated accounting balances'
Craig Maxwell joins the audit and assurance team in Scotland