A majority of investors and analysts reject a simply fair value only model
for valuing financial instruments, according to a survey by PwC.
The research found that most analysts and investors across Europe the US and
the Asia Pacific prefer a mixed measurement method where instruments held to
maturity for their income are valued at amortised cost and only those held for
sale or trading are valued using fair value.
The poll questioned 62 experts with specialisms mostly in banking and
insurance. Around one in ten were generalists. Around three quarters worked with
equities while the rest were focused on fixed income.
PwC said there was also a consistent desire among those polled for improved
disclosure of fair value information.
Those that prefer a mixed measurement method say it better reflect the
reasons for holding on to an instrument.
Pauline Wallace, head of public policy at PwC said the results provided a
useful barometer of thinking on the issue of fair value.
“Clearly there is a breadth of views held by the investment community but it
is striking the extent to which there is a consistency rather than divergence in
opinions across both geography and sectors.
Currently, the International Accounting Standards Board is supporting a mixed
measurement model while standard setters in the US, FASB, have championed a fair
value only method.
The Treasury Select Committee criticises the FRC for a 'lack of curiosity and diligence' in deciding to not investigate KPMG’s audit of HBOS before the publication of a report financial regulators, the FCA and PRA
Despite concerns over the viability of BHS, advisers including Grant Thornton were paid in the millions of pounds for their roles, according to the Work and Pensions and Business, Innovation and Skills Select Committees
Colin ponders how the Pokemon craze is permeating the world of accountancy
The UK’s decision to leave the EU has raised questions about whether the FRC's regulatory framework should change in the future