Global trade in “conflict diamonds” may seem a long way from accounting rule
making, however the two subjects converged last week with proposals which could
force mining and oil companies to reveal shadowy payments to resource-rich
The International Accounting Standards Board last week released a discussion
paper which could lead to a global set of accounting rules for mining and oil
Compiled by senior accountants in Australia, Canada, Norway and South Africa,
the paper explores whether extractive industries should adopt country-by-country
reporting. Under the proposals, mining and oil companies would report royalty,
tax, bonus and licence fee payments for each of their host nations.
The 184-page report represents the culmination of a long-running
international campaign to force companies to reveal how much they pay foreign
It followed a 1999 landmark report A Crude Awakening, by humanitarian group
Global Witness, which showed that wealth generated from oil and mining companies
in Angola helped fuel the nation’s civil war and prop up a corrupt
Following this study, a handful of UK-based humanitarian groups banded
together under the banner Publish What You Pay (PWYP) to campaign for greater
financial transparency from oil and mining companies.
Most multinational businesses aggregate their costs, which makes it near
impossible to define exactly how much they pay host nations.
PWYP, now a global operation, wants international accounting rules to be a
vehicle to force extractive industries to reveal how much they pay governments
around the world. The coalition was intimately involved in the production of the
discussion paper but last week said it was disappointed by the outcome.
The IASB, which must justify any new accounting rules by their relevancy to
the investor community, said there was some demand from investors for the added
information but said there is a risk the new measures will prove too costly and
“The project team notes that further study is required to conclude on whether
the country-by-country disclosure of payments to governments is justifiable on
cost-benefit grounds,” the report stated.
Vanessa Herringshaw, director of Revenue Watch and a member of PWYP,
dismissed these concerns and pointed out that some companies voluntarily publish
a limited form of country-by-country data.
“Companies have this information anyway,” she said. “They have to have it in
order to report their payments and revenue in countries…if they are claiming
they don’t have it one could question whether they have adequate management
Bob Garnett, board member with the IASB, said there was a risk financial
reports would become too lengthy. “The trouble is that with most information, we
ask ‘would [investors] like more’ and the answer is always ‘yes’,” he said.
Before his appointment to the IASB Garnett worked with one of the world’s
largest mining companies, Anglo American plc, where he tried to avoid trading in
so-called conflict diamonds, which fuel civil war and corruption in developing
He dismissed concerns that the information would prove too difficult to
capture. “What we are looking for is anything that is controlled by state
officials…and collecting all of that data will take some time, but it can be
done,” he said.
By the end of 2010 a decision will be made on whether to add the PWYP
proposals to the official IASB agenda, a major step towards it becoming a global
standard. However any final standard could take years to create, approve and
finally be adopted.
Improvements to cashflow statements are being targeted in a consultation launched by the Financial Reporting Council (FRC)
Dr Richard Willis provides a several thousand-year history lesson of the profession, from origin to modern-day
The Financial Reporting Council has issued guidance regarding the annual reporting of 1,200 large and smaller listed companies. The letter highlighted the key issues and improvements that can be made in the 2016 reporting season
Long-serving PwC director Fiona Westwood has moved to Smith & Williamson and stepped up to partner