PracticeAuditReplacement of UK GAAP must pass Government’s cost benefit test, ASB warns

Replacement of UK GAAP must pass Government's cost benefit test, ASB warns

UK accounting chief says rule change must meet cost-benefit criteria

The UK accounting board’s plans to replace the existing accounting code with
international standards will still have to pass the government’s cost-benefit
test, the head of the body warned yesterday.

Ian Mackintosh, chairman of the UK Accounting Standards Board (ASB), said the
planned replacement of UK GAAP, used by non listed, mid-tier companies, would
still need to be sold to the UK government on cost-benefit grounds.

“We have a new government, we have a strong emphasis on cost saving, on
deregulation across all the government and it is going to be very important for
us to be very clear on the cost-benefit of making these changes,” he said.

The ASB wants to bring in new international accounting rules for small and
medium-sized businesses, released in July 2009 by the International Accounting
Standards Board. The new rules will have conform with EU directives on financial
reporting and be endorsed by the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills.

Mackintosh appealed to an audience of accountants at the ICAEW yesterday, to
help make the case for the new rules.

“As you know in all these cases, the costs we can estimate, but the benefits
are very difficult to quantify. Nevertheless, we will be required by the
government to make a good case for what ever it is we propose and it is
fundamental to the success of the proposals,” he said.

Also at yesterday’s event, Mark Smith, secretary with the influential but
reclusive Hundred Group of Finance Directors and director external reporting at
FTSE 250 company Tomkins, said the case had not yet been made to replace the
UK’s existing accounting code.

“I’m not convinced that now is the right time to commit to scrapping the
existing body of UK GAAP,” he said.

“Why is it necessary to have IFRS for SMEs – a form of IFRS light. Doesn’t
this mean that there’s actually a problem with IFRS in that they are too complex
to be used by many companies?

“I reckon it’s likely that the majority of companies in this country have no
idea that the board is proposing these changes let alone that we are sitting
here debating them.”

Further reading:

The
Future of UK GAAP

Vodafone
attacks ‘costly and burdensome’ code change

Related Articles

Don’t delay reporting changes warn firms

Accounting Standards Don’t delay reporting changes warn firms

6y Rachael Singh, Writer
Allow small listed firms to duck IFRS

Accounting Standards Allow small listed firms to duck IFRS

7y Kevin Reed, Writer
ASB's accounting proposals risk multi-tiered confusion

Accounting Standards ASB's accounting proposals risk multi-tiered confusion

7y Michael Goldstein
Activist investor to face Lords audit enquiry

Audit Activist investor to face Lords audit enquiry

7y Mario Christodoulou, Writer
Standards chairman must be part-politician

Accounting Standards Standards chairman must be part-politician

7y Mario Christodoulou, Writer
Letter reveals internal concerns over new accounting code

Accounting Standards Letter reveals internal concerns over new accounting code

7y Mario Christodoulou, Writer
Taxman urges delay of UK GAAP replacement

Audit Taxman urges delay of UK GAAP replacement

8y Mario Christodoulou, Writer
UK GAAP replacement timetable too ambitious: GT

Audit UK GAAP replacement timetable too ambitious: GT

8y Mario Christodoulou, Writer