PracticePeople In PracticeGovernment defends NAO reports

Government defends NAO reports

The government has denied claims that senior officials and ministers can interfere with the preparation of National Audit Office reports, writes our parliamentary staff.

The government’s chief whip in the House of Lords, Lord McIntosh of Haringey, insisted that a ‘long-standing convention’ requires that the facts in a report are agreed between comptroller and auditor general and the accounting officer of the department concerned to prevent the Public Accounts Committee judging between them.

He explained: ‘Accounting officers may have some reservations about the interpretation of the facts in the report. Where such differences are not capable of resolution in discussion, they are explained in the report with the reasons for the differences of opinion clearly stated.’

McIntosh, the government chief whip in the upper house, said: ‘The conclusions and recommendations of the report are, however, for the C & AG.’

But Lord Dixon-Smith asked if he was confident he could satisfy the public about the integrity of reports. Lord Bruce of Donington, an accountant, said that in practice the dividing line between fact and opinion was obscure.

He said: ‘The public are entitled to complete confidence in the NAO and it is desirable in the public interest, never mind tradition, that nobody should interfere with the report which the C & AG seeks to make on his own initiative.’

And Lord Saatchi, for the Tories, said the NAO’s core values included a belief in open communications. He demanded: ‘Will the Government authorise the NAO to disclose on what occasions and in what respect its reports have been altered by ministers?’

Lord McIntosh said the reports to Parliament from the NAO were factually correct ‘and steps are taken to ensure that they are’. He added: ‘Where there are disagreements they are explained in the report, with the reasons for the differences of opinion clearly stated.’

Links

Government keen to restrict Bourn’s powers

Lords move to extend powers of Auditor General

Related Articles

Is inefficiency stealing your time and money?

Accounting Firms Is inefficiency stealing your time and money?

6m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
CIMA elects new president

Institutes CIMA elects new president

6m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Transparent currency trade: How to achieve costs visibility

Governance Transparent currency trade: How to achieve costs visibility

6m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Introduction to KPMG UK’s new leadership team

Accounting Firms Introduction to KPMG UK’s new leadership team

6m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
EY appoints head of UK Infrastructure Asset Intelligence practice

Accounting Firms EY appoints head of UK Infrastructure Asset Intelligence practice

8m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
FRP Advisory expands operation with new office, partner appointments

Accounting Firms FRP Advisory expands operation with new office, partner appointments

10m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Magma Group announces merger, partner promotions

Accounting Firms Magma Group announces merger, partner promotions

10m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
MHA MacIntyre Hudson advises on management buy-out

Accounting Firms MHA MacIntyre Hudson advises on management buy-out

10m Emma Smith, Managing Editor