PracticeAccounting Firms‘Big Brother’ fears over Terror bill

'Big Brother' fears over Terror bill

Fears over spiralling internet access costs and the erosion of privacy have been reignited following the latest governmental moves on data traffic.

The Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Bill, published yesterday, will allow law enforcement agencies to compel ISPs to retain traffic data.

The new Bill builds on the interception and disclosure aspects of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, said Rupert Battcock, solicitor at IT law specialists Nabarro Nathanson.

‘The new Bill would go further than this and introduce a requirement to retain data, at least for a certain period,’ Nathanson said.

Law enforcement agencies have been pushing for the mandatory collection of all types of communication data, in order to create a data warehouse containing communication logs from all internet service providers and telecom operators. The aim is to make policing cheaper, said Caspar Bowden, chairman of IT watchdog, the Foundation for Information Policy Research.

‘This is very close to the classic idea of Big Brother,’ he said.

The European Parliament has also been looking at the issue of data retention as part of its debate on privacy protection in electronic communications.

The UK Parliament voted yesterday to allow its members to restrict data protection provisions ‘if necessary to safeguard national security, defence, public security, the prevention, investigation or prosecution of criminal offences.’

While the European Parliament also voted to ensure that any surveillance would not be allowed on a wide scale and be ‘entirely exceptional’, Battcock warned that conflicts with UK proposals may not prevent the government enacting the Terrorism Bill.

‘If there is any problem, it can probably be sidestepped,’ he said.

Industry body, the Internet Service Providers Association, has questioned the workability of the UK proposals, considering the cost to internet service providers of storing the data and the actual usefulness of it to any police investigation.

The RIP Act caused howls of disapproval from industry watchers concerned about who would be allowed access to information on sensitive internet logs, containing details of websites visited, and who emails have been sent to and received from.

The latest Bill would add to the burden by introducing a requirement for this information to be stored, for an as yet unspecified period.

Links

Blair and Straw poles apart over RIP

Straw defends RIP legislation

  • This article first appeared on vnunet.com

Related Articles

Johnston Carmichael CEO appointed as ICAS president

Accounting Firms Johnston Carmichael CEO appointed as ICAS president

3w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
British Accountancy Awards 2018 – entries open!

Accounting Firms British Accountancy Awards 2018 – entries open!

1m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Is the accountancy sector facing an international talent crisis?

Accounting Firms Is the accountancy sector facing an international talent crisis?

1m Lewis Silkin
RSM appoints new Chief Operating Officer

Accounting Firms RSM appoints new Chief Operating Officer

1m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
RSM announces 11 partner promotions

Accounting Firms RSM announces 11 partner promotions

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
BDO hires former AstraZeneca creative director as head of digital and innovation

Accounting Firms BDO hires former AstraZeneca creative director as head of digital and innovation

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
What does the future hold for listed accountancy firms?

Accounting Firms What does the future hold for listed accountancy firms?

2m Fergus Payne, Lewis Silkin
EY, Deloitte lead Big Four in gender pay gap reporting

Accounting Firms EY, Deloitte lead Big Four in gender pay gap reporting

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor