A fine and costs totalling nearly £1m has been imposed on Price Waterhouse
after the Joint Disciplinary Scheme found it had inappropriately given
unqualified audit opinions on BCCI.
The watchdog said it has fined the firm, which became PricewaterhouseCoopers
in 1998, £150,000 and imposed costs of £825,000 in relation to the audits of
BCCI by the firm’s Cayman Islands office in 1987, 1988 and 1989.
The report said audits for all three years were unqualified inappropriately
because they failed to properly disclose the ‘related party relationship’
between BCCI and another Cayman Islands group ICIC.
In failing to disclose the related party relationship PW was effectively in
breach of International Accounting Standard 24.
BCCI effectively controlled ICIC, even though its staff benefit fund was a
major shareholder in the bank. Sums from the ruler of Abu Dhabi deposited with
ICIC for investment, were also stolen as part of BCCI’s elaborate frauds.
The JDS said there was no question as to the honesty and integrity of PW
staff on the BCCI audit.
PwC chairman Keiran Poynter said: ‘Throughout this matter we have
consistently said that Price Waterhouse was deceived, as indeed criminal
convictions have proved.’
HMRC breaches client confidentiality; and partner profits fall at EY. These stories and more discussed in Friday Afternoon Live
Does Darwin's theory apply to taxation? Colin ponders...
Two new audit partners have been appointed at the firm BDO in its audit practice following continued growth and investment
"The whole idea of HMRC officials supplying confidential information about individuals to the media on a non-attributable basis is, or should be, a matter of serious concern," say Supreme Court judges