The statement follows an interview given by Mike Rake, chairman of KPMG, to the Sunday Times, during which he admitted that another firm could collapse like Andersen.
Rake said most firms faced ‘legal action of various kinds from clients over supposed accounting or consulting errors’ and that was the reason why firms were lobbying for limited liability.
In 2002, KPMG lost to Deloitte in the battle for Andersen, after KPMG was unable to reach an agreement that it felt would protect the firm from any Enron-related liability.
But a spokesperson for Deloitte said the firm was not at risk. ‘We feel the way the deal was structured by our legal advisers for the integration of Andersen staff into Deloitte & Touche, the liability issue was ringfenced.
‘Remember that we were not the only practice to take on Andersen staff,’ the spokesperson added.
During his interview, Rake also admitted that it was painful for KPMG to publish its results, but it was important to ‘practice what you preach’.
The decision to publish full results was taken in the interests of ‘transparency, accountability and openness’, Rake said. ‘We have a major position of trust in the community and ought to be accountable for our results’.
Carter Backer Winter has acquired Edwards Financial Services, expanding its financial planning department
New growth opportunities in Aberdeen, North East Scotland, are being invested in by Grant Thornton
Colin responds to the call for 'Darwinism' in accountancy
A new partner, Dermot Callinan, has joined Saffery Champness from KPMG where he was recently the head of the UK private client advisory team